Swimming against a Tide
Ways I’ve changed in my evangelical faith
Doctrine, part two: What doctrine can’t do
This week I want to push back against some articles written by others — not because I have a chip on my shoulder or animus toward any particular writers, but simply to try and express some of the ways I have changed paths in my own journey of faith.
• • •
The danger in all reading is that words can be twisted into propaganda or reduced to information, mere tools and data. We silence the living voice and reduce words to what we can use for convenience and profit.
• Eugene Peterson
Eat This Book
Today we continue to respond to Tim Challies’ recent blog post, “6 Great Reasons to Study Doctrine.”
As I said yesterday, this article reflects an approach with which I am familiar; indeed, one which I used regularly in earlier stages of my journey. But I’ve altered my course, and I’d like to push back against this post as a way of telling you how I’ve done that.
The six “great reasons” to study doctrine, which he urges us to consider are:
- Doctrine leads to love
- Doctrine leads to humility
- Doctrine leads to obedience
- Doctrine leads to unity
- Doctrine leads to worship
- Doctrine leads to safety
I think there is a fallacy here that undermines all six of these points. That fallacy is that more knowledge, more Bible knowledge, more theological knowledge, more knowledge about God inevitably leads to an increase in virtue.
The fact is that more knowledge may and can help in that process, but only if it is accompanied by other things. The practical reality is that it is easier to pass along a “body of knowledge” than it is those “other things,” and so the church has tended to focus on knowledge dispensing as a primary component of its ministry, thinking that this will lead to transformed lives.
However, could it be more self-evident that this kind of knowledge in and of itself is not sufficient? — “Knowledge puffs up, but love builds up” (1 Corinthians 8:1).
In fact, the stereotype of the unloving, proud, hypocritical, schismatic, idolatrous and insecure religious person (the very opposite of Challies’ doctrine-studying Christian) who knows much but practices little is so pervasive that, in my view, it takes a lot of courage for Tim Challies to write in such glowing terms about the unique value of studying doctrine. I won’t speak for him, but when I was teaching this way, I can only imagine that it was because I was so caught up in my own little religious world that I couldn’t see the facts about life as it is actually lived.
To his credit, he does insert a few caveats along the way, such as:
- “. . . the study of doctrine cannot be the pursuit of dry facts, but facts that lead to living knowledge of God and growing love for God.”
- “Again, theology is not a cold pursuit of facts, but a red-hot pursuit of the living God, and it works itself out all over life.”
But I am not convinced, having known as an evangelical Christian and pastor for many years the way this tends to work out in real life. On the ground, where the rubber meets the road, this translates into a fallacious approach that, if applied to other vocations, would be laughed at. No one, for example, learns to be a skilled musician by studying music in this way.
Knowing and appreciating and even loving Bach do not translate into being able to play Bach.
The problem with the “study doctrine” approach is that it does not go far enough. It substitutes the shell for the kernel. “Change your mind, and that will change your life” rarely works. Christianity is not about developing the right ideas, it is about being raised from the dead into new life.
The virtues Challies commends as growing out of deeper study actually spring organically out of being alive in Christ and develop as we grow from baby steps to maturity, as the Holy Spirit leads us through the experiences of life, especially the things that we suffer.
As Richard Rohr puts it, “We do not think ourselves into a new way of living, but we live ourselves into a new way of thinking.”
Let’s look at just one of the items on Tim Challies’ list. With regard to love, Challies writes, “Your love for God is limited by your knowledge of him, so that you can really only love him as far as you know him. As the depth of your knowledge grows, so too does the depth of your love. This is why the study of doctrine cannot be the pursuit of dry facts, but facts that lead to living knowledge of God and growing love for God.”
Once again, the first problem with this is equating “knowing God” with the “study of doctrine.” When, in any kind of personal knowing, does pursuing facts about a person lead to a living knowledge of that person? We don’t know other persons by studying them. We know them by dealing with them personally. Whatever “facts” we learn don’t come from a book but from our personal interactions.
Tim Challies’ approach ignores an important lesson Jesus taught, recorded in Luke 7:36-50.
A Pharisee invited Jesus to dinner. The dinner was interrupted by a sinful woman, who burst in without shame or concern for propriety and anointed Jesus’ feet from an alabaster jar, bathing them with her tears and kissing them. The knowledgeable, religious, respectable Pharisee was appalled and objected. But Jesus said this to him, contrasting his righteous, well informed host with the unknowledgeable woman: “For this reason I say to you, her sins, which are many, have been forgiven, for she loved much; but he who is forgiven little, loves little.”
Challies assumes that “knowledge of God” comes through doctrine, through learning a “body of knowledge,” from retaining certain facts about God that somehow get internalized and transformed into love. But consider this woman. She did not show great love because she learned certain facts about Jesus and meditated on that knowledge until it somehow got translated into her loving actions. Not at all. Whatever knowledge she had grew out of personal dealings with Jesus that set her free from sin and raised her up into new life. Love wasn’t knowledge she applied. It exploded from her. It couldn’t be contained.
New life begets love. Not more knowledge, even knowledge of God.
We usually don’t “learn our way into loving.” Studying doctrine can certainly be intellectually stimulating and it can teach us some things about God’s character and what may or may not be the right thing to do. It may lead us to invite Jesus to dinner so that we can consider these matters with him. And don’t we all look forward to such stimulating religious conversations?
We might even decide his word is true and good and try to do the right thing and so honor the God we’ve learned about.
But studying doctrine won’t wake me from the dead, make me abandon my pride, sacrifice my precious ointment, and fall down at Jesus’ feet in a hot mess of loving tears and outrageous abandon.
Go ahead, study the book. Only engaging the living Word personally can tear me apart like that.












