Friday with the Fathers (4)

The Church Fathers, Kievan Miniature (11th c)

By Chaplain Mike

Today, in our Lenten series on the Apostolic Fathers, we consider a work that many think comes to us from the days of the apostles themselves: The Didache (The Teaching).

Known in ancient times as The Teaching of the Lord to the Gentiles by the Twelve Apostles, or, in shorter form, The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles, this book has been dated as early as 50 AD, though most scholars tend to think it was written around 100 AD. The only manuscript we have (from 1056 AD) was discovered in 1873, though The Didache was mentioned in many ancient sources. As Michael W. Holmes notes, an early date is suggested by “the relative simplicity of the prayers, the continuing concern to differentiate Christian practice from Jewish rituals (8:1), and in particular the form of church structure—note the two fold structure of bishops and deacons (cf. Phil. 1:1) and the continuing existence of traveling apostles and prophets alongside a resident ministry.”

Scholars have observed connections between The Didache and the Gospel of Matthew, and some posit that these works may have been created in the same geographical, historical, and cultural setting. Its contents suggest a possible provenance in Syria or Palestine, and one of the main issues involved the relationship between Christian congregations and the practices of the Jewish community. Others have noted possible links with the situation in the region of Antioch and early controversies in the church regarding Gentile conversion (Acts 11-15). There are also links with the Epistle of Barnabas, which we will talk about when we discuss that work.

The Didache has been conceived as a manual of instruction for congregations that includes:

  • Moral instruction (perhaps for new believers or baptismal candidates) (1-6)
  • Instructions for church practices and order (7-15)
  • A concluding apocalyptic exhortation (16)

Continue reading “Friday with the Fathers (4)”

FAQ: On Grace

Update: As I said, the word “grace” causes a lot of Christians to get their undies bunched up. So before you start to tell me just how wrong I am to say that we are saved—and continue in our salvation-–by grace through faith alone, I urge you to scroll over to the righthand side of this page and download—for free—Dr. Rod Rosenbladt’s”The Gospel For Those Broken By The Church.” Is the Gospel of Grace enough even for the Christian? Listen to that. Then listen again. He says it all much better than I can.

Wow. Nothing stirs the pot here at the iMonastery like the topic of grace. Just tossing out that word gives many iMonks the heebie-jeebies. I really think many would be so much happier if we could put grace on a shelf and glance at it once in a while as we hurry past carrying our Book of the Law under our arms. Of course, the laws in your book will be different from the laws in my book. Otherwise we wouldn’t need all the different denominations, and many a pastor would be out of a job and have to find another way to make a living. But I digress.

You already know my thoughts on grace, and you are already irritated by those thoughts. (One commenter earlier this week referred to one of my previous posts saying that I think we should just quit trying since Jesus has already done it all. Exactly! He gets it, even though he was not trying to be complimentary.) So I thought today we would ask our founder, Michael Spencer, his thoughts on the subject of grace. These are all his exact words, taken from essays he wrote dealing with the topic of God’s grace. Shall we begin?

Continue reading “FAQ: On Grace”

IM Book Review: The Language Of Science And Faith

Oh, boy. Here we go again, wading into the murky waters of how-we-all-got-here. Strap on your galoshes and let’s hope we don’t get too messy.

Frequenters of Internet Monk will already be fluent in the language of the conversation. For the newly initiated: on one side, at its most extreme, we have those who say the account given in the book of Genesis must be taken as the word-for-word truth and that any deviation from a literal translation is a slippery slope to apostasy. On the other side, at its most extreme, we have those who say the world is old, we all evolved, the Bible is a myth, and God isn’t real, so grow up, accept the truth, and have a nice lunch, because that’s as good as it gets.

But is there middle ground? Is there room in this world for anyone who might fall into the middle? Is there even such a thing as a middle?

I’ll get to the book review in a minute, but first, a personal story. I have a friend named Sean who grew up in a conservative  home, not unlike the first extreme I mentioned above. Sean grew up believing in a literal interpretation of the first few chapters of Genesis, and he was pretty dogmatic about it. Through high school and college, these things weren’t constantly on the forefront of his mind, but they were always preached to him as being an integral part of his faith.

Sean meandered around in the professional world for awhile before deciding to go to grad school and embark on a career in the sciences. And as he dug deep into his studies there, he began to encounter overwhelming evidence that the worldview he’d grown up with wasn’t all he’d thought it was. Suddenly, he was faced with the very real possibility that the world was older than he believed and that there may be some validity to this dreaded “evolution” stuff.

And so, Sean had a crisis of conscience that essentially went like this, “Hey, all those people who taught me stuff about God and Jesus might have been wrong in their histrionic denouncement of the evils of evolution and old-Earth geology. What else might they be wrong about? Perhaps the whole thing?”

He hung it up. All of it. His entire faith swung from one extreme end of the pendulum to that other one, the one where the most you can hope for out of life is a decent lunch and a contribution or two to the ever-expanding ladder of mankind.

Continue reading “IM Book Review: The Language Of Science And Faith”

The Liturgical Gangstas Talk about Lent

Presented by Chaplain Mike

Four of our Gangstas have come out of hiding (though they are still not showing their faces) to talk with us about how they approach the season of Lent, personally and in their church traditions.

Also—A big IM “Congratulations” to Gangsta Rev. Angie Gage, who was married on March 18 to John Michael III at her church in Paragould, Arkansas.

TODAY’S QUESTION: We are in the midst of the Lenten season. Describe how you personally approach Lent and Holy Week. What devotions or spiritual practices do you participate in during this season as an individual and/or with your family? How does your particular church tradition inform and contribute to your personal practices?

Rev. William Cwirla (Lutheran, LCMS)

The word “Lent” comes from the word for “Spring,” the season falling in early Spring. Lent is a kind of “spring cleaning” for the soul. As the Israelites once swept their houses clean of leaven in preparation for the Passover, so Lent is a time of sweeping out our lives of all that interferes with our receiving the gifts of Christ. “Cleanse out the old leaven that you may be a new lump, as you really are unleavened. For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed. Let us therefore celebrate the festival, not with the old leaven, the leaven of malice and evil, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth” (1 Corinthians 5:7-8).

Continue reading “The Liturgical Gangstas Talk about Lent”

Continuing Discussion: “To Change the World”

By Chaplain Mike

Today we consider our discussion of James Davison Hunter’s profoundly stimulating book, To Change the World: The Irony, Tragedy, and Possibility of Christianity in the Late Modern World.

Hunter’s book challenges common Christian notions of “changing the world” and “transforming the culture.” We are dealing with a particular subject that is being talked about in evangelicalism these days, most prominently in the United States—are Christians called to “transform culture”? For a generation now, evangelical Christian leaders have been calling us to do this, and Hunter is responding to that appeal.

After suggesting that common Christian approaches, such as the “worldview” movement, have a simplistic understanding of culture and what is required to actually change it, in chapter four of his book James Davison Hunter sets forth eleven propositions that describe an alternative view of culture.

The prevailing view of culture is a weak view and the strategies for change that emerge from it are ineffective, largely because they fail to take into account the nature of culture in its complexity and the factors that give it strength and resilience over time.

…And so I will simply lay out the heart of an alternative approach in eleven propositions—seven about culture itself and four about cultural change. (p. 32)

This is one of the most important chapters in this book, for it summarizes Hunter’s overall perspective of culture and culture change. This is the foundation for all he will say in subsequent chapters. Once again, I encourage readers to patiently digest the material and try not to run ahead to “answers” yet. After all, we are talking about “changing the world.” One would think a good amount of thought and preparation ought to go in to such a task.

I have paraphrased Hunter’s propositions below for our discussion.

Continue reading “Continuing Discussion: “To Change the World””

iMonk Classic: An Excerpt on Grace

From Michael Spencer’s Classic Post, “Our Problem with Grace”

Note from CM: Some recent comments prompted me to recall some words from Michael Spencer about grace. It’s what we’re all about here at IM, and it deserves continuing emphasis.

The Gospels are full of examples of people whose observable obedience is unimpressive when compared to other “seriously religious” people, but whose faith in grace is pleasing to God. In fact, the Gospels give considerable evidence that the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ absolutely relishes tweaking our noses when obedience, not grace, starts to become the focus.

Let’s take two examples from the teaching of Jesus.

Continue reading “iMonk Classic: An Excerpt on Grace”

First Quarter Listening Report

By Chaplain Mike

Today, I will update you on some of the music that I’ve been listening to during the first quarter of 2011. My collection was enhanced more than usual because of a generous gift of an Amazon gift card from a dear friend (thanks, DS!). It gave me the opportunity to try out some new sounds and to get caught up on some music I had heard about but had not had a chance to purchase previously.

From past “lists” that we have done, you probably know that I am an aficionado of the “singer-songwriter” genre in particular. I came of age in the late 60’s and early 70’s, so a lot of the popular music that I like reflects the pop and folk-rock sounds of that era. My first quarter report is heavy on that style.

NEW MUSIC (2011)

The Decemberists, “The King Is Dead”
This group’s most straightforward album. Known for their British folk sound marked by storytelling and refined lyrics, this record pares things down and focuses the group’s energy into a simpler, more direct approach without losing style. Two “hymns” to the seasons, January and June, are highlights for me, as well as rocking tunes “Down By the Water” and “This Is Why We Fight.”

Continue reading “First Quarter Listening Report”

Rachel Held Evans on Evangelicalism’s Future

By Chaplain Mike

There is no doubt that Christianity is undergoing a sea change. The recent and ongoing rhubarb over Rob Bell is yet another example of evangelicalism’s identity crisis.

In a few weeks, we here at Internet Monk will be reviewing Michael Spencer’s classic series of articles on, “The Coming Evangelical Collapse.” I encourage you to go back and read through these insightful posts in preparation for the discussion to come.

In the meantime, conversations continue all over the web. Last week we pointed you to Jimmy Spencer’s sense that a split in the evangelical movement is imminent, and Jonathan Fitzgerald’s counter that evangelicalism is in an ongoing state of erosion, not schism. Scot McKnight raised the question of a potential major split at his blog and pointed to some of the ways people are answering that question. From the New Reformed perspective, Kevin DeYoung suggests that these kinds of doctrinal disputes probably won’t divide evangelicalism, but may prove that we are already divided.

Rachel Held Evans has offered her perspective in a post called, “The Future of Evangelicalism—A Twenty-Something’s Perspective.” I encourage you to go to her blog and read the entire article.

Then come back and we will discuss her predictions, which I’ve included below.

So my first prediction is that in the next few years the evangelical community will engage in a serious conversation about the Bible. And I suspect that that will be the tipping point McKnight asks about. Let’s pray that this conversation will be as civil and as loving as possible.

My second prediction is that the so-called “new evangelicals” will in large part drop the evangelical label. We don’t like labels to begin with, and evangelicalism already carries a lot of political and theological baggage. Some will head to mainline churches, others will rediscover the rich history of the Catholic and Orthodox traditions, and some will leave Christianity altogether. Still others will remain evangelical in spirit, but without the label—opting instead for “non-denominational” or simply “follower of Jesus.”

My third prediction is that the word “evangelical” will go the way of “fundamentalism” as its adherents become increasingly homogonous and as the word becomes associated with dogmatism regarding politics, science, women’s roles, homosexuality, salvation, and biblical literalism.

THAT IS UNLESS my generation—both Reformed and emerging/progressive evangelicals—decide to intentionally preserve the diversity of our tradition, stop launching personal attacks, and move forward together. …

I haven’t lost hope in the future of evangelicalism, but I’ve lost the desire to fight for my place in it. I’m tired of trying to convince other Christians that I am a Christian. As Dan and I enter that stage of life when we will likely start a family, we want to raise our kids in a community of Christ-followers where diversity is celebrated, questions are welcomed, and differences are handled with love and respect…not flippant “farewells.”

We want to get busy, get our hands dirty, start serving and growing and changing the world. This may very well lead us to the mainline, or perhaps to something associated with the Anabaptist tradition, or perhaps to something very similar to evangelicalism….but without the label.

A Conference I Recommend

By Chaplain Mike

“…his reply has been, “My grace is enough for you: for where there is weakness, my power is shown the more completely.” Therefore, I have cheerfully made up my mind to be proud of my weaknesses, because they mean a deeper experience of the power of Christ. I can even enjoy weaknesses, suffering, privations, persecutions and difficulties for Christ’s sake. For my very weakness makes me strong in him.

• 2Corinthians 12:9-10

For years, when I was a pastor, I avoided conferences. To me, they were the equivalent of motivational pep rallies combined with business seminars touting “cutting edge” success models. Plus, places to drop a lot of bucks on books. I told friends and leaders in my churches that I would be much more open to going to a conference of “regular pastors” — folks involved at street level in small to mid-size churches who weren’t there because they had the answers and solutions to all ministry questions and problems, but simply to share stories and ideas, to enjoy fellowship and pray for each other, to admit our weaknesses and to find hope in the God whose grace is sufficient.

That conference has been planned. It will be held April 14-16 in Lansdale, PA. I recommend it to you today. Here is a brief video about the “Epic Fail Pastors Conference,” with full information below.

Epic Fail Pastors Conference from Epic Fail Pastors Conference on Vimeo.

When: April 14th – 16th. Registration will start at 6 p.m. on Thursday, we will start at 7 p.m. We will be done at noon on the 16th.

Where: 3rd and Walnut Bar & Grill in Lansdale, Pennsylvania. Why? This site wasn’t originally a bar. It was a church. In fact, it was the first church established in the borough of Lansdale over 100 years ago. It failed. They shut its doors thirty years ago, it was then sold to the Elks Club and ten years ago, it was sold once again to a bar owner.

Cost: $79. This covers the cost of the conference. You are on your own for food and lodging.

ISN’T THIS A GREAT IDEA?

Lent III

Jesus and the Samaritan Woman at the Well, Guercino

By Chaplain Mike
Today’s Gospel: John 4:5-42

a sonnet

he knew, and how he knew i’ll never know
this thirsty stranger standing at the well
i came at noon to avoid abhorring eyes
and constant cutting comments i can’t quell
and there this man, this jewish stranger, stood
bold to approach, to speak, to break taboo
and even dare to ask me for a drink
i sneered in scorn; he did not have a clue
he took my guff and countered my disdain
by laying out my life in open view
yet, knowing all, the gift he still held forth
and suddenly, a thirst within me grew
he told me all things i had ever done
and waters flowed from this poor heart of stone