Michael Spencer wrote a post a couple of years ago entitled “Happy Enough Protestant“. It was his response to many inquiries as to why he did not convert to Roman Catholicism. While Michael was a “Happy Enough Protestant“, he was not a “Happy Enough Evangelical“. InternetMonk.com has been a window into why he was wandering in the “Post-Evangelical Wilderness”.
There are many who will read this post who have been burned by Evangelical churches, or they look at the Evangelical movement as a whole and don’t like what they see. I recently read a comment by a reader who was out of work. His Evangelical churches did not offer any help, but his Catholic neighbors did. He concluded by saying that whatever church he ended up in next it would not be an Evangelical one.
I could trot out the statistics at this point and show how the Evangelical movement is better at caring for their neighbors than other faith expressions. But there would be no point, the experiences that people have with their local expression of Evangelicalism, would totally supersede any statistical summary that I would bring forward. Others, like Michael Spencer, look nationally, and see many aspects of Evangelicalism with which they are very uncomfortable. So Michael, like others, wander in this Post-Evangelical wilderness.
The problem is, how do you stop wandering in the wilderness? The wilderness is not where you want to be. It might provide some perspective for a time, and the solitude might be refreshing, but like the Israelites you want to eventually find the “Promised Land”. I wish Michael was alive to write a follow-up to his book Mere Churchianity: Finding Your Way Back to Jesus-Shaped Spirituality, because this is the question that I think he had the most difficulty answering. Continue reading “Escaping the Post-Evangelical Wilderness?”
You just can’t stop technology. And apparently you can’t stop evangelicals from thinking that every new or improved technology that comes along should be used to “advance the Gospel.”
And so we learn that Fellowship Church in Dallas, Texas (Pastor Ed Young) will be offering 21 Christmas services in 3-D at their multiple campuses. Those who attend will be given 3-D glasses to watch the high tech experiences. When asked about the novel approach, Pastor Young said, “We’re doing a 3-D Christmas because people are looking for height, width and depth in their lives.” OK, that’s the kind of hokey statement that turns me into a grinch.
The church is promoting the events by handing out invitations (which you can also print at their website) that offer a 3-D experience when you activate them through your computer’s webcam and sound.
And again I ask—Just because we can . . . must we?
We’ve come a long way from the manger.
I wonder if they’ll be singing “When You Wish upon a Star” in the part about the Wise Men?
If someone wanted to do an intriguing Hollywood historical drama about a strong woman, holding her own in momentous times, he or she could do worse than to produce a film about Katharina von Bora, the nun who became Martin Luther’s wife.
Today, December 20, she is commemorated by Lutherans on their calendar of saints.
Born in 1499, Katharina was placed in a convent when she was three years old, after her mother had died. Von Bora was raised in relative seclusion, but in her teen years she and her fellow nuns heard of Martin Luther’s teachings and became persuaded of Reformation principles. Learning of their faith and desire for a life outside the convent, Luther himself became involved in a plot to help twelve nuns escape. A merchant friend who delivered fish to the convent smuggled them out and hid them in his empty fish barrels, leading them on a dramatic, smelly, ride to freedom. Some of them returned to their families, some found positions as servants, and some married. Eleven of the twelve found a measure of security in ordinary life.
the “DREAM Act” that would have provided a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants who came to the United States as children.
Though I normally don’t care to talk much about political matters here on Internet Monk, I find these two cases interesting for the light they may shine on the church in America.
One of them is about an issue (homosexuality) that has been a primary focus of public discussion and political action for the Christian Right because of its moral implications.
The other (immigration reform) has been considered a primary issue of social justice in our country by the Christian Left.
The fact that these two matters, important to Christians on both ends of the political spectrum, came to a vote on the very same day provides a curious conjunction which begs for an Open Mic conversation here on IM. So here we are.
I invite you to join in and let us know what you think these two votes say about where the church in America finds itself at the present with respect to political positions and action in the U.S.
What have you heard and read about DADT and the DREAM Act from a Christian perspective? Is anyone talking about these votes in your church or among your Christian acquaintances? Have you developed strong opinions on these issues? How has your faith informed those opinions? Do you feel comfortable discussing them with other Christians?
Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign: The virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and will call him Immanuel.
• Isaiah 7:14, NIV
It’s time again for the annual “Mary” discussion. This is the one time of year when Protestants are forced to consider her as they read OT prophecies of the Virgin Mother and the NT nativity narratives. For Roman Catholic or Orthodox traditions, Mary is emphasized throughout the year in various ways, particularly through the use of such liturgical texts as the Magnificat. However, for children of the Reformation, the Advent and Christmas season is one of the few times we hear her name or think of her story.
Last year, I wrote this about Mary:
Evangelicals tend to ignore or downplay Jesus’ mother, in reaction to what they perceive as overemphasis or even heretical devotion to her by the Roman church and other traditions. However, the Gospel of Luke gives her great honor, portraying her as the true and ultimate matriarch of our faith. Mary joins and surpasses Sarah, Rebekah, Rachel and Leah, Ruth, and Hannah, and is presented as the mother through whom God brought his redemption promises to pass.
As the Mother of Our Lord herself put it,
My soul glorifies the Lord
and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior,
for he has been mindful
of the humble state of his servant.
From now on all generations will call me blessed,
for the Mighty One has done great things for me,”
holy is his name. (Luke 1:46-49, NIV)
On this fourth Sunday in Advent, as we hear Isaiah’s word about the virgin to whom will be born the promised child, Paul’s greeting in which he points us to God’s “Son, who was descended from David according to the flesh,” and Matthew’s Gospel story of the young woman who was “found to be with child from the Holy Spirit,” let us consider how one of our prominent Protestant forefathers thought about Mary.
Madonna and Child, Lippi
Martin Luther honored Mary highly. He held her in high esteem for her role in God’s salvation plan. The former monk retained beliefs he had from his Roman Catholic upbringing and training, such as Mary’s immaculate conception (though his views on this are complex) and perpetual virginity. He venerated her as the Theotokos (Mother of God), said that Christians should likewise consider her their “spiritual Mother,” and called her the “highest woman and the noblest gem in Christianity after Christ . . . She is nobility, wisdom, and holiness personified. We can never honor her enough. Still honor and praise must be given to her in such a way as to injure neither Christ nor the Scriptures.” (Sermon, Christmas, 1531)
Though he venerated Mary and even conceded that she prays for the church, Luther’s view also offers a protest against the abuses of Catholicism with regard to over-emphasis on Mary. For example, consider these words from The Defense of the Augsburg Confession (1530):
Granting that the blessed Mary prays for the Church, does she receive souls in death, does she conquer death (the great power of Satan), does she quicken? What does Christ do if the blessed Mary does these things? Although she is most worthy of the most ample honors, nevertheless she does not wish to be made equal to Christ, but rather wishes us to consider and follow her example (the example of her faith and her humility).
One of Luther’s clearest writings concerning Mary is his Exposition of the Magnificat (1520-21), composed for a young prince who had supported and interceded for him. One aspect of this study that may surprise Protestants is that Luther began his exposition with an invocation to Mary herself:
May the tender Mother of God herself procure for me the spirit of wisdom, profitably and thoroughly to expound this song of hers, so that your Grace as well as we all may draw therefrom wholesome knowledge and a praiseworthy life, and thus come to chant and sing this Magnificat eternally in heaven. To this may God help us. Amen.
In his explanation of this great hymn of praise from Luke 1:46-56, Luther noted first of all that Mary was of humble birth and background. She had little to distinguish or set her apart from the ordinary maidens of the land.
The tender Mother of Christ . . . teaches us, with her words and by the example of her experience, how to know, love and praise God. For since she boasts, with heart leaping for joy and praising God, that He regarded her despite her low estate and nothingness, we must needs believe that she came of poor, despised and lowly parents. Let us make it very plain for the sake of the simple. Doubtless there were in Jerusalem daughters of the chief priests and counselors, who were rich, comely, youthful, cultured, and held in high renown by all the people; even as it is to-day with the daughters of kings, princes and men of wealth. The same was also true of many another city. Even in her own town of Nazareth, she was not the daughter of one of the chief rulers, but a poor and plain citizen’s daughter, whom none looked up to nor esteemed. To her neighbors and their daughters she was but a simple maiden, tending the cattle and doing the house-work, and doubtless esteemed no more than any poor maidservant today, who does as she is bidden about the house.
Madonna and Child with Angels, Botticelli
Furthermore, any honor Mary received comes solely from God’s grace, by which he gifted her with the great privilege of being Christ’s mother.
Mary confesses that the foremost work God wrought for her was that He regarded her, which is indeed the greatest of His works, on which all the rest depend and from which they all derive. For where it comes to pass that God turns His face toward one to regard him, there is naught but grace and salvation, and all gifts and works must needs follow. . . . And that Mary herself regards this as the chief thing, she indicates by saying, “Behold, since He hath regarded me, all generations shall call me blessed.”
Note that she does not say men shall speak all manner of good of her, praise her virtues, exalt her virginity or her humility, or sing of what she has done. But for this one thing alone, that God regarded her, will men call her blessed. That is to give all the glory to God as completely as it can be done . . . .
From this we may learn how to show her the honor and devotion that are her due. How ought one to address her? Keep these words in mind and they will teach you to say: “O blessed Virgin, Mother of God, thou wast naught and all despised; yet God in His grace regarded thee and wrought such great things in thee. Thou wast worthy of none of them, but the rich and abundant grace of God was upon thee, far above any merit of thine.”
Next Mary also freely ascribes all to God’s grace, not to her merit. For though she was without sin, yet that grace was too surpassing great for her to deserve it in any way. How should a creature deserve to become the Mother of God! Though certain scribblers make much ado about her worthiness for such motherhood, I will yet believe her rather than them.
She says her low estate was regarded by God, nor was that a reward for anything she had done, but, hath done to me great things. He hath done this of His own accord without any doing of mine. For never in all her life did she think to become the Mother of God, still less did she prepare or make herself meet for it. The tidings took her all unawares, as Luke reports ( Luke 1:29). But merit is not unprepared for its reward, but deliberately seeks and awaits it.
Finally (and here I quote from another sermon by Luther on this passage), Mary remained a humble, faithful believer, even with the great honors God bestowed on her. In his remarks on Luke 1:46 (“Mary stayed with Elisabeth about three months, and then returned to her own house”), the Reformer commends her as an example of one who lived out the grace of God by remaining faithful in her ordinary vocation.
See how purely she leaves all to God, and claims for herself no works, honor, or reputation. She behaves just as she did before any of this was hers–seeks no greater honor, is not puffed up, vaunts not herself, calls out to no one that she is the mother of God, but goes into the house and acts just as before–milks cows, cooks, scrubs the kettles, and sweeps the house like any housemaid or housemother in the most menial tasks, as if none of these overwhelming gifts and graces were hers. Among the other women and neighbors she was esteemed no more highly than before and did not ask to be. She was still a poor townswoman among the lowliest. What a simple pure heart was hers! What an amazing person she was! What mightiness was hidden below her lowliness! How many there were who met her, talked with her, who, had they known, would have been overpowered in her presence.
• From “Visitation,” in Martin Luther’s Christmas Book (ed. Bainton)
One of the greatest Latin hymns is known as the Stabat Mater. There are two forms of this hymn, the Stabat Mater Dolorosa (The Sorrowful Mother Stood), and the Stabat Mater Speciosa (The Beautiful Mother Stood). The first describes Mary’s sadness at Jesus’ death, the second her joy at the birth of her Son. A few stanzas from this great hymn may complete our meditation on Mary today and help us to enter into the fellowship of her joy in God’s gracious Gift.
The beautiful Mother
stood joyously at the crib
in which her child lay
Through her exultant soul
Dancing with joy
Went a song of rejoicing
O how jubilant and blessed
was the immaculate
Mother of the Only-begotten
O how happy and laughing
And exultant did she watch
The birth of her divine son
Who would not rejoice
If he saw the Mother of Christ
In such comfort?
Classic iMonk Post by Michael Spencer From December 20, 2006
Note from CM: This was a sermon Michael wrote for the Advent season. It was expanded from a talk he gave at soli deo on 1/19/06.
“There is, in fact, no worldview more reprehensible in its arrogance than that of a religious believer: the creator of the universe takes an interest in me, approves of me, loves me, and will reward me after death; my current beliefs, drawn from scripture, will remain the best statement of the truth until the end of the world; everyone who disagrees with me will spend an eternity in hell…. An average Christian, in an average church, listening to an average Sunday sermon has achieved a level of arrogance simply unimaginable in scientific discourse–and there have been some extraordinarily arrogant scientists.â€
One more week until Christmas! Did I scare you? Have you finished your Christmas shopping yet? Have you started? Oh my. Looks like someone is going to need an extra helping of Saturday Ramblings to make it through the week. (Mr. Bones requested the week off, but I think we found a suitable replacement. Not sure which of Santa’s reindeer this is. Happy? Sneezy? Help me out here.)
The pastor of First Baptist Church of Dallas has started GrinchAlert.com to warn consumers in the Dallas metroplex of stores that fail to say “merry Christmas.” He feels it is important to let you know of stores that instead wish you “happy holidays.” The pastor, Robert Jeffress, says, “I believe our nation overall is going to be healthier as a nation with a public acknowledgment of God than we are if we allow the secularists, the atheists, the infidels to remove any mention of God from our public arena and that’s why I’m doing this.” Sigh…and you people get on my case when I make fun of Texas. With things like this, I don’t have to.
In the meantime, it appears we as a nation are divided as to whether businesses should say “merry Christmas” or “seasons greetings.” And then Michelle Van Loon wonders if we have strayed from celebrating the true meaning of Christmas even in our churches. Finally, Skye Jethani has some ideas of how to take the stress out of Christmas this year for your family and your church.
Jeff, as usual, presented a good, well-defended list of Christmas movies yesterday. One of these days he’s going to make me do a “list” post first so that he can have the last word.
Until then . . .
Movies on Jeff’s List with which I agree completely . . .
A Christmas Story
Miracle on 34th Street
It’s a Wonderful Life
Elf
Holiday Inn/White Christmas
If I were making my list first, White Christmas and It’s a Wonderful Life would be #2 and #1 respectively. The other three would be honorable mention. I am not as familiar with a couple on his list (Christmas in Connecticut, the George C. Scott Christmas Carol). I’ve seen a few parts of Polar Express, but not enough to have a strong opinion. And I haven’t liked any of the Narnia movies, though the BBC series was OK. In contrast to my good friend, I do happen to be a huge fan of Christmas Vacation, which just proves what a juvenile, crass, shallow person I am.
My kids wonder at times why I bother to have a color TV. “Dad, all you want to watch are black and white movies.” That is fairly accurate. And their point is what?
At Christmas, I somehow find more time to sit and watch a whole movie. And I do enjoy the old ones, I must admit. And yes, I do believe there is a special level in hell for whoever it is who colorized the classic black and white films I love so much. But I will still watch them. What I won’t watch are any movies with country music stars in them. Or movies with articles of clothing in the title. (The Christmas Shoes. The Christmas Sweater. The Christmas Boxers. You get the idea.) And I know I am in a very small minority, but I am not a fan of National Lampoon’s A Christmas Vacation. Sorry, not my cup of hot chocolate.
I found it hard to identify more than three Christmas books I like, and I only came up with four Christmas TV specials. But I have no trouble naming quite a few Christmas movies that I will watch over and over. I’ll start with a few Honorable Mentions, then move to my top five. As always, your suggestions in the comments are always welcome. And, as always, if you want to look into buying any of these, please click on the links provided. If you purchase through our affiliates, part of your purchase price comes to the Internet Monk. Thank you!