IM Book Review: Sacred Pathways

One Size Fits None
Review of Sacred Pathways by Gary Thomas

We’ve all held up ridiculously sized articles of clothing and scorned their boast that one size fits all, from Linda Hunt to Shaquille O‘Neal.  We know that clothes should be made in different sizes.  We accept that not all medicine is suitable for all people and all ailments.  No one thinks that everyone should marry the same person or live in the same size house.

Why is it then that there is a one-size-fits-all evangelical do-it-yourself worship procedure?  A quiet time, personal Bible study with highlighter markers at hand, and church on Sunday morning and Wednesday night — that’s what Christians do.  If this regime doesn’t help you, then do it harder.  See if there’s some unexamined sin in your life that’s separating you from God, then get up earlier in the morning and do it again.  And again.

Gary Thomas’ book Sacred Pathways is a breath of fresh air to those who are suffocating in poorly fitting spiritual disciplines.  The book is not about corporate worship.  Mr. Thomas does not go anywhere near the Worship Wars, liturgy versus free form services, hymns versus choruses, etc.  He is writing for people who want to grow closer to God in their private worship.Continue reading “IM Book Review: Sacred Pathways”

A Person of Peace in a Land of Lies

By Chaplain Mike

This is the second in our series of “Midweek Psalms.”

The first psalm in the “Psalms of Ascent,” the collection of Psalms that speak of the pilgrimages Israelites took to participate in the feasts in Jerusalem, is not about the journey, but about where the journey begins.

In Psalm 120, the pilgrim going to Jerusalem describes where he lives and laments the spiritual conditions there.

The Situation
The general situation is one of “trouble” (1) and “war” (7). Where he lives, the person of faith feels continually opposed and oppressed. Specifically, he lives in a community that promotes lies and deceit (2-4). He likens his situation to living in “Meshech” and Kedar,” places known for continual warfare and hostility (5).

The Setting in the Book
In the Book of Psalms, the “Songs of Ascent” are found in Book V (Psalms 107-150), the book of hope for returned exiles from Babylon. Strategically placed in Book V, these psalms call the returnees to look to Jerusalem, the place where God will provide shalom as he regathers his people and establishes his rule over all nations.

Ps 120, with its emphasis on the difficult circumstances of the faithful in exile and return, sets the stage for the rest of the ascent psalms, which call God’s people to a pilgrimage of hope in Messiah’s coming reign.

The Messiah’s Lament
A third level of understanding comes when we read Ps 120 as “a prayer of the king.” In this light we are reminded of the hostile environment to which Messiah Jesus came. “He came to his own, and those who were his own did not receive him” (Jn 1.12). Hebrews calls us to “consider Him who has endured such hostility by sinners against Himself” (Heb 12.3). Jesus was the ultimate person of peace in a land of lies. Yet ironically, in the midst of continual opposition, and by laying down his own life under a sentence of unjust lies, he provided ultimate peace (Rom 5.1).

Our Longing for Shalom
Peace, or shalom, plays an important part in the Psalms of Ascent, appearing at key points in the collection to describe what the pilgrim seeks in and for Jerusalem and God’s people. This is, indeed, what all people long for. Shalom means wholeness, health, freedom from all oppression and trouble, relational harmony and complete well being.

The new creation will be God’s Peaceable Kingdom, a place of universal shalom under the Messiah’s rule. No more trouble, lies, deceit, injustice, hostility, conflict. The feasts in Jerusalem enjoyed by the First Testament pilgrims were foretastes of that shalom. As temporary reprieves from the daily disorientation of living in Meshech and Kedar, they provided a great hope and hunger for ultimate peace.

The Challenge of This Psalm
The challenge of this psalm for Christ-followers in the NT era is to be shalom-makers in the midst of our troubled world as we continue to await the coming Kingdom of peace. At times we cry out to God and lament our circumstances, yes. However, our daily faith journey with Jesus also calls us to arise, walk out into our world and say, “I am for peace.”

Today’s Art: Psalm 120, by Aaron Collier.

Where Is “Emerging” Now, and Where Is It Going?

By Chaplain Mike

According to Rick Bennett, aka DJ Word, the obituary for the Emerging Movement has already been written:

MINNEAPOLIS — The Emerging Church, the controversial Christian movement that inspired many to plant churches, leave behind their faith and question authority, died in her sleep Thursday following a short illness. She was 21 (according to some sources).

The cause was cardiac arrest, according to spokesperson Steve Knight. According to police, foul play and suicide have not been ruled out at this time. According to person of interest, Andrew Jones, she was ready to die and beyond any life-saving treatment.

Mrs. Church was the “reason for the failure of many church institutions and the paved the road to Hell with good intentions”, according to critic Ken Silva. While she has many enemies in established and institutional churches, many of whom were distant relatives, according to supporters, Mrs. Church was instrumental in the advent of many advances in the Christian church, including facial hair, tattoos, fair trade coffee, candles, couches in sanctuaries, distortion pedals, Rated R movie discussions, clove cigarettes and cigars, beer and use of Macs, as well as the advancement of women’s issues, conversations about sexuality, environmentalism, anti-foundationalism, social justice and the demise of the Republican party’s stranglehold on young Christians.

Is this true? Or have rumors of “Emerging’s” death been greatly exaggerated?

Continue reading “Where Is “Emerging” Now, and Where Is It Going?”

Convince Me!

By Chaplain Mike

OK, you are going to find out today just how cantankerous and out of touch the ol’ Chaplain is.

The longer I have been a believer in and follower of Jesus, the less I have been attracted to “movements” (“fads?”) in the church. I realize this puts me at odds with those who think I am constantly missing “catching the wave of the Spirit” as he does “new and exciting” things among his people. It’s just that, the older one gets, the more one sees these movements come and go, ebb and flow, morph and get swallowed up into other waters. The relentless changes and enthusiastic voices exclaiming the arrival of the “next wave” get shrill and annoying after awhile. Count me as one who longs for continuity, roots, depth, and proven staying power with regard to matters of faith.

If that makes me an obstreperous old coot, then so be it.

When it comes to the Emerging Church movement, I’ve heard those voices calling. I’ve wandered the bookstore aisles and seen the growing number of titles filling the shelves, calling out for those weary of church as we know it to forge a new path. I’ve seen the articles describing the phenomenon. I’ve noticed the websites proliferating. I guess my contrarian streak goes deep. Or perhaps I’m just a pessimist. I figure if something is that popular and trendy, it must not be the real deal. Maybe it’s just the old hippie in me—never trust “the Man” who’s trying to sell you something.

Which leads me to my point in this post: I have never read Brian McLaren.Continue reading “Convince Me!”

The Emerging Movement: Getting the Big Picture

By Chaplain Mike

Series Note: This is the first in a series of posts on the Emerging Church, one of the three “streams” that has come forth from the old evangelical coalition. In future weeks, we will discuss the Ancient-Future movement, and the New Reformed Movement.

Getting a handle on a movement as diverse as “the emerging church” can be a challenge. A helpful overview, however, has been done for us already, making our job much easier.

In this post, I will get our discussion started by summarizing Scot McKnight’s classic article in Christianity Today, “Five Streams of the Emerging Church” from February, 2007.

First, Scot reminds us that, when it comes to defining the emerging church, it is courteous to let those within a movement tell us what it is, rather than simply imposing our own ideas upon it. So, he quotes the definition given by Gibbs and Bolger, Emerging Churches: Creating Community in Postmodern Cultures:

Emerging churches are communities that practice the way of Jesus within postmodern cultures. This definition encompasses nine practices. Emerging churches (1) identify with the life of Jesus, (2) transform the secular realm, and (3) live highly communal lives. Because of these three activities, they (4) welcome the stranger, (5) serve with generosity, (6) participate as producers, (7) create as created beings, (8) lead as a body, and (9) take part in spiritual activities.

Continue reading “The Emerging Movement: Getting the Big Picture”

Three Streams in the Post-Evangelical Wilderness

By Chaplain Mike

Here at IM, we recently noted that Scot McKnight joined a conversation at Patheos on “The Future of Evangelicalism” with his article “The Old Coalition Is Passing.”

In his article, Scot observes that the old coalition of evangelicalism has become fragmented into “alternatives and elements” rather than an identifiable coalition. In particular, there are three movements within evangelical faith and practice that have grown into prominent streams:

…first, the ancient-future movement spearheaded by Robert Webber; second, the emergent/emerging movement spearheaded by young thinkers and leaders like Brian McLaren who knew that fundamentalism and the neo-evangelical coalition weren’t listening to the youth culture; and third, the revival of Calvinism among the NeoReformed, spearheaded — almost singlehandedly, I think — by John Piper and those who flocked to his side. Within this NeoReformed movement is the massive influx of Southern Baptists, who were formerly neither as vocal in their Calvinism nor as concerned with the older neo-evangelical coalition, but who are now undoubtedly a (if not the) major voice in the NeoReformed and fundamentalist awakening among some evangelicals.

These, says McKnight, are not the only alternatives—certain evangelical denominations, prominent megachurches and parachurch ministries maintain positions of influence, for example. However, these three particular movements have attracted a lot of adherents and attention in this post-evangelical era.

Over the next three weeks, we here at IM will devote several posts to each of these three streams running through the post-evangelical wilderness.

We are doing this precisely because we are NOT experts with regard to these movements. We want to learn more. We want to hear your experiences. As pilgrims trying to negotiate the post-evangelical landscape, we are interested to hear of your involvement and interaction with these three groups that have grown so much over the past 10-15 years.

Please join the conversation.

A Gospel Thought for Monday Morning

By Chaplain Mike

To start our week out, here is a  good thought from Tullian Tchividjian:

I once assumed the gospel was simply what non-Christians must believe in order to be saved, but after they believe it, they advance to deeper theological waters. Jonah helped me realize that the gospel isn’t the first step in a stairway of truths but more like the hub in a wheel of truth. As Tim Keller explains it, the gospel isn’t simply the ABCs of Christianity, but the A-through-Z. The gospel doesn’t just ignite the Christian life; it’s the fuel that keeps Christians going every day. Once God rescues sinners, his plan isn’t to steer them beyond the gospel but to move them more deeply into it.

Surprised by Grace: God’s Relentless Pursuit of Rebels, p. 16

Filled with Passionate Intensity

Does anyone else cringe when they hear the over-used  word “passion”What’s your passion? —  “I have a passion for — something.”  “I’m so passionate about that.”

I don’t think these people know what they’re really saying.

Bear with me here. I’m launching into a history of the word from its origins to its modern usage. I have a purpose in doing so, one that relates to a proper understanding of the Christian life.

The word passion comes from the Latin word meaning “to suffer.” There are two meanings combined in both the Latin and the English. One is simply to endure, or to be the recipient of action, to be passive. The other is to experience pain.

The first meaning of passion in the Oxford English Dictionary, the multi-volume resource of word usage throughout the history of English, is generally capitalized.

  • It means Jesus’ suffering before and during the crucifixion.
  • It may by extension mean the Gospel narratives referring to his suffering.
  • Or it may even be a piece of music on the same topic, such as Bach’s St. Matthew Passion.
  • Next, it can mean the suffering of any martyr, or the suffering brought on by any affliction or disease.

These are not what modern evangelicals mean when they refer to their passion for orphans, or teaching Bible studies, or scrapbooking for the Lord.

The second category of meaning in the OED is “the fact of being acted upon by external agency, being passive, being subject to external force.” Do the people who boast of their strong feelings for a particular calling mean to imply that they are passive and are possessed or propelled by some outside force? What outside force would that be?

The dictionary moves to the more familiar usages: “an affection of the mind; a feeling by which the mind is powerfully moved or acted upon.” It goes on to “an abandonment to emotions,” “angry or amorous feelings” and “sexual desire.”

Finally it arrives at the meaning we commonly hear in evangelical circles: “an eager outreaching of the mind toward something; an overmastering zeal or enthusiasm;” or as a noun, “an aim or object pursued with zeal.”

Several things are common to all these definitions.

  • First is the strength of feeling involved, whether it is presumed to be a pleasant or an unpleasant feeling.
  • Second is the “passivity” of the person experiencing the feeling. We speak of being moved as a synonym for feeling passionate, and it is a good synonym. The OED uses the words “acted upon,” “abandonment” and “overmastering” in its definitions of passion, also implying a loss of control or a loss of self.

What do people think they’re really saying when they claim to be passionate about something? Are they implying that the strength of their feelings determines the value of the object or pursuit? Or do they mean that the strength of their feelings witnesses to the fineness and devotion of their own characters?

I think they’re often saying both.

Certainly people who have a passion think well of themselves for having it. Linguistically they are comparing their interest in their current spiritual hobby with the suffering of Jesus and the deaths of the martyrs. But was passion the foundation for the obedience of the martyrs or the total self-emptying of Christ? We know that in human relationships passion is usually the opposite of committed longevity. No, the passion of the martyrs or Jesus means not the fervor with which they faced suffering but the suffering that came about because of their faithfulness.

To me the proclaiming of a passion sounds like boasting. I don’t know that I’m right to think so in every case. Many people who declare they are passionate about something are just using the accepted phrase without considering what they’re saying. But some people who “have a passion” are definitely trying to trump others who are humbly obeying God’s word and finding God’s work.

Boasting of passion, however, is a dangerous boast. As I mentioned above, one aspect of “passion” is being acted upon by an external agent. These boasters may not think so, but the’re saying that they are under compulsion from some source, that they are being moved, or driven, to feel as they do. Let’s remember that strong feelings and external compulsions are not solely the attribute of the good. The poet Yeats reminds us that “the worst are filled with passionate intensity.”

You may be thinking that I am blowing this out of proportion. The huge majority of people who talk about their passion don’t mean any of the things I’m saying, nor do they know or care about the etymology of the word. They just mean that they care a lot about something.

But even that is tricky. I find very often that the things I care most about, that I’m most passionate about, are not the things that God cares most about. Some of my most passionate prayers have been answered with a resounding “No!” Saint Paul found the same thing. He prayed three times, he said, to have his affliction removed from him — that would qualify as passionate. God told him no, that God’s purposes will be accomplished in his own way, that God’s “power is made perfect in weakness.” Not Paul’s passion but God’s will determined what was right and important.

To the Church Fathers, passion, or zeal, was always bad. Passions were uncontrollable forces that you suffered. If they weren’t sins themselves they were at least temptations to sins. The passionate man never dwelt in God’s peace. He was like the infant described by Saint Paul in Ephesians 4:14, “tossed back and forth by the waves, and blown here and there by every wind of teaching and by the cunning and craftiness of men in their deceitful scheming.”

Saint Isaac of Syria, one of my favorites among the Fathers, says this:

A zealous [or passionate] person never achieves peace of mind.  And he who is deprived of peace is deprived of joy.
If, as is said, peace of mind is perfect health, and zeal [passion] is opposed to peace, then a person stirred by zeal is ill with a grievous sickness.
Zeal is not reckoned among mankind as a form of wisdom; rather it is one of the sicknesses of the soul, arising from narrow-mindedness and deep ignorance.
The beginning of divine wisdom is the serenity acquired from generosity of soul and forbearance with human infirmaties.

• Daily Readings with St Isaac of Syria, A.M. Allchin, ed., Templegate Publishers, Springfield, IL 1990.

Passion and soul-sickness on the one hand? Divine wisdom and serenity on the other?

I’ll choose Door Number Two.

Take Cover!

By Chaplain Mike

Today’s Gospel: Luke 12:49-56

In the light of today’s words from Jesus, I find it supremely ironic that, as reported in Saturday Ramblings yesterday, a megachurch in the Midwest has a COMEDIAN taking the pulpit in its services this weekend.

Jesus’ words at the end of Luke 12 are anything but comedy. And those who sit comfortably in the theater-style “worship centers” of American evangelical churches, having their ears tickled by “nightclub-tested, family-approved, clean stand-up comedy” sounds like just the kind of audience Jesus would have “targeted” with this message.

When you see a cloud rising in the west, you immediately say, “It is going to rain”; and so it happens. And when you see the south wind blowing, you say, “There will be scorching heat”; and it happens. You hypocrites! You know how to interpret the appearance of earth and sky, but why do you not know how to interpret the present time?

Continue reading “Take Cover!”

Old Books and New

We all had fun recently listing our favorite novels for Jeff Dunn.  The lists included many excellent, inspiring books, and some that were odd, amusing, or horrifying.  The majority of them were written since 1900.  It’s natural that when we read for pleasure we would read contemporary books, particularly novels, that use modern dialects and deal with familiar issues.

But C. S. Lewis (another contemporary writer) doesn’t want to leave us there, among the comfortable books of our own age.  In his introduction to “Athanasius on the Incarnation,” he says this:

It is a good rule, after reading a new book, never to allow yourself another new one till you have read an old one in between. If that is too much for you, you should at least read one old one to every three new ones.

He’s writing this advice not to scholars but to amateurs like us, and he is speaking particularly of books on theology.  He would recommend that after reading Robert Capon, we should read Athanasius.  Why?Continue reading “Old Books and New”