Adjectives and Calvinists: A Killer Combination

No one….No one….excels at rhetoric like Calvinists. I’m sorry guys, love ya, but some of you are the biggest fan clubbers I’ve ever seen. Brian Mclaren doesn’t have this kind of devotion. And N.T. Wright can only dream.

Calvin’s birthday has given the rhetorical athletes a chance to really strut their stuff. I know we all can brag, but short of Catholics going on about the saints, do you ever hear anything quite like this? (Note: Please start “William Tell Overture.”)

Towering over the centuries of church history, there stands one figure of such monumental importance that he still commands attention and arouses intrigue, even five hundred years after his appearance on the world stage. Called “one of the truly great men of all time,” he was a driving force so significant that his influence shaped the church and Western culture beyond that of any other theologian or pastor. His masterful expositions of Scripture laid down the doctrinal distinctives of the Protestant Reformation, making him arguably the leading architect of the Protestant cause. His theological thunder defined and articulated the core truths of that history-altering movement in sixteenth-century Europe.

In turn, those lofty ideas helped fashion the founding principles of Western civilization, giving rise to the republican form of government, the ideals of public education, and the philosophy of free-market capitalism. A world-class theologian, a revered exegete, a renowned teacher, an ecclesiastical statesman, an influential Reformer — he was all of these and more. His name was John Calvin.

I think I need to buy a dictionary of adjectives. I’m feeling like I’ve been run over by a truck.

84 thoughts on “Adjectives and Calvinists: A Killer Combination

  1. Well, if those statements are true, then what’s the problem?

    I do have a problem with adjectives like “revered.” And “ecclesiastical statesman” is a real problem. This has been the problem with the Church ever since Constantine. It’s the “bad marriage” (English for “Pergamos”) between church and state.

    Like

  2. Ok… this post adds nothing to any profitable discussion at all. Please dispute any of the claims below with a historian (Calvinist or not, Protestant or not, Christian or not), and they will laugh at you.

    “All of these statements about Calvin are true. He wasn’t the most important man in the world, no one is saying that. But there is nothing similar to this description and a Catholic presentation of a saint.

    In turn, those lofty ideas helped fashion the founding principles of Western civilization, giving rise to the republican form of government, the ideals of public education, and the philosophy of free-market capitalism. A world-class theologian, a revered exegete, a renowned teacher, an ecclesiastical statesman, an influential Reformer — he was all of these and more. His name was John Calvin.”

    Intelligent commentary on any of these would have been informative, or possibly helpful. This post however is simply uninformed and annoying.

    Believe me, there are plenty of things Calvinists can and should be given a hard time about. But this is just not one of them.

    Like

  3. When Mary Tudor was Queen of England (about which Calvin did have a thing or two to say!), a number of English Protestants found it suddenly more congenial to spend time abroad, in places like Geneva. Sir William Stafford was one of them. He was such an admirer of Calvin that when his youngest son was born (to his second wife Dorothy), Sir William actually proposed to name the boy “Calvin” (thus forever derailing the historical timeline of comic strips, among other things ;)).

    The story is that when John Calvin himself found out about this, however, he was appalled, and persuaded Sir William to name the boy John instead. So perhaps Calvin exhibited a bit more humility than some of his posthumous admirers would like 😉

    Like

  4. This was written by Steve Lawson? What is the book? I have to know! 🙂

    I admire Lawson as a powerful expository preacher, but you’re right, Michael– his rhetoric got loose from him this time and created something sublimely, if unintentionally, comedic! (I agree what much of the *substance* of what he wrote here, but man– it’s almost Faulkneresque!)

    Like

  5. Man, I take some time to read and comment on some other blogs (and on Facebook), and I miss some gems here! 🙂

    I’m a Christian who is a joyful “five-pointer” (as in Calvin, Piper, Storms, desiring and enjoying God, etc.), but this avalanche of rhetorical overkill is one of the funniest things that I have read in some time! That’s it, I’m posting it to my Facebook page– my friends will get a kick out of it, five-pointers or not!

    Like

  6. (Yeah, I’m late to the party. What’s new?)

    A long time ago I decided that, even though I believe in the (actual) fundamentals of the faith, I’d never self-identify as a fundamentalist because of all the skubala that the hyper-fundies have attached to that word.

    Even though I am theologically very similar to John Calvin, I’m this close (thumb and forefinger an angstrom apart) from adding “Calvinist” to that list.

    Like

  7. Curtis, her parents were from Waterford and she was reared in Cork, so she probably did have an accent sounding sumtin’ loike dat, bye! (something like that, boy!)

    But I do wish the reverend father had restrained the novelistic impulse and just put it all in English 🙂

    Like

  8. Martha,
    Yes, by Tweety Bird, I was referring to her cutesy lisp. “Mudda” instead of “mother” and so on. A freakish cross between Shirley Temple and Sarah Palin.

    I should write a quaint infancy narrative for M. Jean Chauvin… “Gosh golly, mamma, I dunno how preacha say Jesus die for AWWWL folks when da Bible say he done die jis’ fer dee elect”

    Like

  9. Headless, by “talking like Tweety Bird” I think Curtis was referring to the ‘cute’ attempts at dialect that the Little Nellie memoir was written in; you know, having the pious child lisping in her quaint working-class brogue saying “gib” for “give” and “dem” for “them”, while everyone else speaks Standard English.

    Though since I’m from County Waaaaaderfuuuhrd (local pronunciation of “Waterford”) myself, I can’t throw stones in this glass house 🙂

    Like

  10. Michael,

    I kind of wish you’d left some of those posts up, as they really proved your point.

    🙂

    Like

  11. Apparently Clavin refused a gravestone and a few months later no-one could accurately say where he was buried. I can see why he did that.

    Like

  12. My apologies to everyone for some of the posts that got on here while I was gone. I’ve deleted them.

    Sense of humor people. Acquire one.

    Like

  13. Headless, when you speak of the Little Flower, you hit the nail on the head.

    I read the standard Life of her way back and nearly choked to death on the saccharin. — Martha

    You know, if the writers of those bowdlerized Lives of the Saints were around these days, they could make a HUGE pile of money by going Protestant and writing Sweet Christian (TM) Bonnet Romances for the CBA/ECPA…

    The Calvin eulogy is actually pretty tame. Maybe if they exhumed his corpse 20 years after he died and found the body perfectly incorrupt as well as a golden tulip growing out of his mouth with the words “solo deo gloria” engraved on the stem, it would interest me.

    Are you saying that you don’t believe St.Nicholas, as an infant, fasted from breast-milk on Wednesdays and Fridays?

    And I suppose St.John the Baptist just had the hiccups when he leapt in the womb? — Curtis

    You forgot all the Victorian Holy Card pictures of the newborn infant Christ solemnly blessing Mary, Joseph, the three Magi, the Shepherds, and the animals with the Sign of the Cross (using the exact gesture of a Papal blessing). Tell me when you run across a RL newborn who acts like that instead of crying, sucking, and pooping.

    Haha, I am familiar with Little Nellie and, oh boy, how the tooth does ache. — Curtis

    From what little I know after going down that link, I don’t think I want to know.

    I find Blessed Anne Catherine Emmerich the same way. I feel like I’ve gorged myself on ice cream and cake after reading about her. At least she doesn’t talk like Tweety Bird, though. — Curtis

    Talk like Tweety Bird? WTF?

    And do I really WANT to know?

    Like

  14. he was literally hunted down and he gave his life to his beliefs.

    Um…he literally died in his sleep at the age of 54 as the result of his numerous health problems. Just so we’re clear.

    Like

  15. Debbie said, “He changed Christianity and the way the Bible is…read…”

    Well, I guess I can’t deny that.

    I would have almost sworn this had to come from something published by Banner of Truth Trust. Well, Ligonier’s a close second. I have a mental picture of lots of high fiveing over at the Puritanboard.

    Like

  16. And to think that 500 years from now, they’ll be pouring the hyperbole on the tribute to you, Michael:

    Towering over the internet’s longest-running theological soap opera, there stands one figure of such monumental importance that he still inspires flaming and arouses the watchbloggers, even five hundred years after his appearance on the World Wide Web….

    Like

  17. Funny, funny stuff bro!! Its even funnier to wake up to the “fact” (after doing the hard work) that good old Jean would have nothing to do with these people 🙂

    ….and wonderfully liberating

    Like

  18. Martha,
    Haha, I am familiar with Little Nellie and, oh boy, how the tooth does ache. I find Blessed Anne Catherine Emmerich the same way. I feel like I’ve gorged myself on ice cream and cake after reading about her. At least she doesn’t talk like Tweety Bird, though.

    But not all child saints are so appalling. Dominic Savio and Maria Goretti come to mind.

    There is a certain logic to such cases. If God does not reward effort with grace but gives it freely, why should he not give it to children, even the unborn? Ex ore infantium perfecisti laudem, Super senes intellexi, &c…

    Like

  19. Memphis Aggie: for a Christian version of The Onion, try larknews.com. But iMonk is hard to beat sometimes.

    Like

  20. Curtis, precocious infant piety is one of my bugbears. The opportunities such a topic provides for a deadly combination of sentimentality, tweeness, and clucking like a brooding hen drives me batty.

    We have a local example here; there is still a devotion to a child called “Little Nellie of Holy God” and if your stomach is strong enough, here’s an account dating from 1911:

    http://www.knocknovena.com/Little%20Nellie%20of%20Holy%20God.htm

    I think this is probably the Catholic equivalent of that baby preacher video Michael posted on here, or does anyone remember “God’s Little Elvis”?

    Like

  21. HAHAHAHAHA!!!!! 🙂

    :gasp:

    Laughing some more…

    :intake breath:

    Oh my…the William Tell Overture just did it for me. I am a musician. I have every jot and tittle of that thing memorised from Conducting Class, over 30 years ago!

    And I am a recovering Calvinist.

    :”) Beginning to giggle…

    Like

  22. HUG,
    You’ve read biographies of Ignatius that do not mention his soldiering days? That is bizarre, because a worldly, sinful past is a goldmine of hagiography. Most authors play up the bad parts to great effect.

    The Calvin eulogy is actually pretty tame. Maybe if they exhumed his corpse 20 years after he died and found the body perfectly incorrupt as well as a golden tulip growing out of his mouth with the words “solo deo gloria” engraved on the stem, it would interest me.

    And Martha,
    Are you saying that you don’t believe St.Nicholas, as an infant, fasted from breast-milk on Wednesdays and Fridays?

    And I suppose St.John the Baptist just had the hiccups when he leapt in the womb?

    For shame – real Catholics delight in child saints.

    Like

  23. In a weird way, it reminds me of an infomercial. I kept waiting for the offer of some free doodad to go along with the overblown promotion. 🙂

    Like

  24. Headless, when you speak of the Little Flower, you hit the nail on the head.

    I read the standard Life of her way back and nearly choked to death on the saccharin. But even there, elements of the real Therese peered through (any fifteen year old who takes advantage of a Papal audience to demand of the Pope that he tell the Carmelites to let her join before the official age of entry is not a swooning, shrinking violet).

    The plaster saints make it sound so easy that it’s setting the bar impossibly high for us to imitate them. We can’t imagine doing things like that in our lives, or being so pious from an early age, so we as much as say “No point in me trying!”

    Which is completely the opposite of what the lives of the saints tell us – that they were ordinary men and women, struggling with problems in their private lives and in the wider society around them, who put their trust in God and with His grace achieved marvels. If everyone from illiterate cripples to heirs to a royal crown could give their hearts to God, what is stopping us?

    Like

  25. Michael, since we seem to have trodden on some Calvinists’ corns, I hereby give you full permission to dig out the floweriest, fluffiest, sugariest, most pink’n’sparkly fluffy bunnies and kitties excesses of 19th century hagiography for the next RC saint’s day and mock the living daylights out of it… — Martha

    Like the Perfect Painted Plaster Saints version of saint’s biographies?

    Like the one on St Ignatius Loyola that never mentioned he was a Spanish Army Officer and swashbuckler?

    Or the one on St Philip Neri that never mentioned his wacked-out sense of humor?

    Or the one on St Rose of Lima that never mentioned her psychotic self-destructiveness?

    Or the original edited memoirs of St Therese of Lisieux, the ones that bowdlerized out her “little way” of finding God in everyday routine that was the reason for her canonization?

    Like

  26. And I agree with the intro by Steve Lawson. Calvin was all of that and more in my opinion. I wish there would be more John Calvins, Jonathan Edwards, in the church today, these men bucked what they had heard, traditions, and went straight to the Bible for their doctrine. They in turn were completely transformed and passed what they have learned on to us.

    I would be hard pressed to find anyone today that I could write such an introduction about, but I believe this describes the man of John Calvin as I have come to know him through his many writings. He changed Christianity and the way the Bible is both read and distributed.

    Like

  27. Speaking of comedy and therefore Jack Chick, I should thank that guy. If it wasn’t for him, I’d probably just be a lukewarm Catholic. I actually first found his trash stuck in my college campus Catholic Church lit stand.

    Like

  28. I’m glad you know some Catholics who “go on” about the saints, iMonk; most of us don’t have enough material to “go on” about. As for bragging, doesn’t that imply taking some credit? (Would that I could “brag” about Mother Theresa or Maximilion Kolbe.)

    Anyway, I wonder how Calvin himself would react to this kind of tribute? I don’t know much about him, but if he found time to be holy–in between bouts of thundering and towering, of course–he would no doubt be embarrassed to the point of humiliation by such an essay. I know what you mean about Billy Graham, Scott, but as far as I can tell, he tends to redirect personal praise sent his way back “up the chain.” Hopefully Calvin would do the same.

    Like

  29. “The esteem they hold the guy in really does make it impossible to for any of them to reasonably accept any fair critiques of his tendency to bend scripture in order for it to fit his theology.”

    Yes… That’s why Calvinists are all paedobaptists!

    Like

  30. “Just as God was foreordained in everything He does before there was God.”

    Okay – that’s not really saying that God had a beginning, right?

    Right?

    Though I am heartened to see, from the comments on here, that there is indeed a Reformed version of “More Catholic than the Pope”.

    Ah, there’s one in every family, eh? 🙂

    Like

  31. Although I would be labeled a Calvinist because of my beliefs (though I detest the label), I find it appalling that any man would be lauded in such manner. A lifelong Southern Baptist myself, these words of praise for Calvin are eerily similar to the thoughts and expressions of many of my fellow SBCers regarding our own golden boy, the Reverend Billy Graham.

    Like

  32. This reads like a parody, especially the “towering over the centuries …” line. Is there a religious version of the Onion? If not there should be.

    Like

  33. Towering over the centuries of church history, there stands one figure of such monumental importance… he was all of these and more. His name was John Calvin.

    Are we talking John Calvin or Barack Obama?

    You were foreordained from before the creation of the universe to say that, Michael — Martha

    Just as God was foreordained in everything He does before there was God. (No BS — my writing partner had recent run-ins with young hyper-Calvinists and THAT is EXACTLY what they claim — even God bends the knee to Utter Predestination.)

    Like

  34. If they’re Christians, they’d better be celebrating his *real* birthday, on May 27, and not the day he came out of his mother’s womb, on July 10.

    Like

  35. Michael, since we seem to have trodden on some Calvinists’ corns, I hereby give you full permission to dig out the floweriest, fluffiest, sugariest, most pink’n’sparkly fluffy bunnies and kitties excesses of 19th century hagiography for the next RC saint’s day and mock the living daylights out of it 😉

    Thursday is Ascension Thursday, so probably not a good day to pick, what with it commemorating Our Lord and all 🙂

    Today is St. Bernadine of Sienna, who promoted devotion to the Holy Name of Jesus (the IHS monogram which the Jack Chick pamphlets maintain stands for “Isis Horus and Set”, the *real* gods of the Roman Church, so that may be fruitful ground for you). Friday is St. Rita of Cascia and that’s probably the best chance – the poor woman suffered much in life, and if she had any literary taste at all I’d say in her afterlife not the least of her sufferings would be some of the more glutinous literature commemorating her – if you can’t find anything appropriate there, you won’t find it anywhere. 🙂

    Like

  36. K.W.

    I think that you are right about transfering papal infallibility to Calvin, except without restrictions.

    But, what really happened is that one of them hacked into the computer system holding the Marian fanatics words, changed gender and printed it out. GRIN

    Like

  37. Wish Calvin’s fanboys could show half that zeal for Jesus…

    But seriously: The esteem they hold the guy in really does make it impossible to for any of them to reasonably accept any fair critiques of his tendency to bend scripture in order for it to fit his theology. I’m not saying he’s the only one who did it; I’ve caught Augustine, Luther, Arminius, Wesley, and Spurgeon doing it. Most Christians do. I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt and say they were doing it unwittingly. Even so, you gotta recognize these guys were human and made mistakes… unless you’ve decided that during the Protestant Reformation, God sovereignly transferred papal infallibility to Calvin.

    Like

  38. Monk,

    Okay, okay! Maybe it’s not your dumbest post. Still, the excesses of the Calvin, Puritan, Spurgeon, Lloyd-Jones, MacArthur, Piper, et al devotees can be posted every day. Why put Calvin in a ridiculous light on his birthday? I’m not humor challenged. Really, I’m not. Some of my best friends are comedians.

    Like

  39. Some day I will have to read a little of Calvin’s own writings. I am told that Calvinists of today are more “Calvinist” than Calvin!

    Martha, I LOVE the way you think. We need to keep things a little lighter in this serious realm of theology and you help to do that. I think Jesus MUST have been fun to be around. Folks certainly often gravitated to him, even though sometimes Jesus said they did it for the food he provided them. Buy hey, they still might have learned something.

    Like

  40. I think we are all well aware of the irritation calvinists can bestow upon us with their intellecual snobbery , their flowery oratory , their 10,000 word dissertations on every subject that no one has the time or energy to read and the general annoyance of being abosutely correct about everything. Yet I believe they are vital part of Christianity with what they bring to the table. Their love of the scriptures , their devotion to truth and their contribution to evangelicalism in my opinion has been a great benefit to Chistianity.

    Like

  41. “…— he was all of these and more.”

    What more is there? Yes, it does remind me of hyper-pious descriptions of saints.

    Like

  42. All kidding aside, Calvin has turned my household upside down. (And not necessarily in a good way.)

    Like

  43. You should see the ones I’m not posting.

    Which btw, those of you who want to go all serious about this, for or against, aren’t going to make it past moderation.

    Like

  44. MP, no disrespect to Calvin, but anything that starts off “Towering over the centuries of church history” gives me an image of a giant Calvin ready to stomp Zurich a la Godzilla and Tokyo.

    Like

  45. As a Calvinist, I think that we should be able to laugh at some of these interesting observations. The comments, however, seem to be loaded with the same type of overkill that iMonk wrote about.

    Like

  46. My dumbest post ever?

    You need to spend more time in the archives.

    BTW, did you see the “laugh or else” category? I believe you’ve chosen “else.”

    I had no comments on Calvin’s significance whatsoever.

    I did have some comment on excessive efforts in rhetoric.

    Like

  47. Monk,
    This has got to be your dumbest post. While Calvin was not all your blogger made him out to be, he was a good and great man whose memory deserves better. Maybe you can re-read your piece on Gene Scott to see how Christian leaders can be honored without being worshiped.

    Like

  48. Jugulum said:

    Brian said,

    I just dawned on me that the whole Calvinist/Arminian things sounds a whole lot like “I am of Paul” or “I am of Apollos” or “I am of Cephas.”

    I’ll settle for being a plain old Christian.

    Heh. So, let me get this straight, Brian…

    Your response to “I am of Paul” or “I am of Apollos” or “I am of Cephas” is… “I am of Christ”?

    I’m from the Churches of Christ; we have this “Christ clique” thing down pat. 😉

    Like

  49. Brian said,

    I just dawned on me that the whole Calvinist/Arminian things sounds a whole lot like “I am of Paul” or “I am of Apollos” or “I am of Cephas.”

    I’ll settle for being a plain old Christian.

    Heh. So, let me get this straight, Brian…

    Your response to “I am of Paul” or “I am of Apollos” or “I am of Cephas” is… “I am of Christ”?

    Like

  50. “(H)e was a driving force so significant that his influence shaped the church and Western culture beyond that of any other theologian or pastor.”

    I suppose, to be fair, without Calvin there would have been no Calvinists. And no Calvinists means we probably wouldn’t have heard of St. Francis de Sales. And no St. Francis de Sales would mean no patron saint for journalists – a body of professionals who, frankly, need all the saints they can get – so thanks for that, Jean!

    Like

  51. Ya know, I get tired of hearing everyone else arguing over what Calvin said, what he meant, and whether He was right. What better occasion, then, to finally open those dusty books and read what he said for myself.

    My pastor said Calvin’s institutes were excellent reading for when you are having trouble sleeping at night. We’ll see if he uses as many adjectives. Maybe it’s something inherent in reformed theology that calls for vividly colorful descriptions of everything 😛

    Like

  52. You were foreordained from before the creation of the universe to say that, Michael 🙂

    Like

  53. I agree with Christopher. I think any godly person would be uncomfortable with such an account of themselves. It seems like this person is trying to flatter a dead dude, no disrespect.

    Oh yeah, Congrats on being born about 500 years ago John.

    Like

  54. Yeah, yeah, yeah…. Like absolutely NO ONE else had anything to do with the Reformation. Nothing like a little selective historical amnesia…bunch of drooling fanboys.

    Like

  55. I just dawned on me that the whole Calvinist/Arminian things sounds a whole lot like “I am of Paul” or “I am of Apollos” or “I am of Cephas.”

    I’ll settle for being a plain old Christian.

    Like

  56. Wait…Western civilization was founded AFTER Calvin? I mean, I know we protestants are often accused of thinking that Christianity stopped with the apostles and began again with the Reformation, but this is beyond even that!

    Like

  57. Considering the state of the world economy today, do they really want to saddle Calvin with the responsibility for free-market capitalism? 😉

    Like

Leave a comment