Why I won’t be going to church Sunday

briarwoodflag-0703jpg-aa41ffcefc015fdf_largeLast week, our pastor announced that we would be having a patriotic service on the Sunday of July 4th weekend.

I won’t be there.

Let me make something perfectly clear. I love my country, the United States of America.

I have no trouble displaying the flag on appropriate occasions (though my wife, with her Mennonite background, is not enthusiastic about the idea).

I appreciate our nation’s heritage of liberty and opportunity, and am proud that we have been able to change our Constitution and laws over the years to deal with our blind spots and make that more available to everyone.

I love the land in which we live, in all its breathtaking beauty and variety.

I enjoy the diversity of cultures that find a home in the U.S.

I love our history of entrepreneurism, our “can do” spirit, the generosity of our people, and the idealism with which we approach life.

On the other hand, I am often critical of our country and its leaders, policies, and actions, as well as the prejudices and parochialism many of us display, both here and abroad. There are aspects of our past and present which deeply disturb, embarrass, and grieve me, but the freedom to voice my critiques openly is another reason I’m glad to be a citizen of the U.S.

I don’t find it incompatible to be a follower of Jesus Christ and one who loves his country. One’s national heritage is a gift of God’s common grace. Those of us who have enjoyed life in places that are beautiful, free, and abounding with prosperity have received more than a common share of God’s blessings in this regard. I find it incumbent to thank God for this. I pray my children and children’s children will likewise enjoy these gifts.

We emphasize this regularly in church, too. Most worship services in our congregation include prayers of thanksgiving and intercession that relate to our daily lives where we live, our leaders, crisis situations our nation or community faces, and so on. We pray for justice and peace, for wisdom and the common good. We remember our dead, including those who have died as members of the military. We petition God to protect those currently serving in harm’s way. It is my opinion that church leaders should encourage their parishioners to be good citizens who are involved in their communities, working to strengthen its institutions, contributing to the well being of their neighbors through good works of love.

But I abhor civil religion. I cannot tolerate the mingling of God and country that is represented in so many churches in the U.S. on holidays like Independence Day. The sanctuary is not the place for patriotic display, singing hymns to America, and venerating the red, white, and blue.

In his excellent article, Why Younger Evangelicals May Feel Uneasy in a Patriotic Church Service, Trevin Wax tells of the following encounter:

The first time I ever questioned the appropriateness of patriotism in worship was when I was doing mission work in Romania.

After I had learned the language and settled into ministry in a village church, I remember asking a pastor friend why we didn’t do a special service in December that celebrated Unification Day (Romania’s national holiday). I also wondered why the Romanian flag wasn’t in the sanctuary.

The pastor looked at me funny and then said: “The only way we’d bring a Romanian flag into our sanctuary is if we brought in flags from all over the world.” 

“To show you do missions?” I said, trying to find a reference point from my own culture.

“No, to show we are the church.”

Exactly.

“Make disciples of all nations” is our mandate. If churches were to honor our citizenship in Heaven and the membership of the one, holy, and apostolic church by use of flags, we would include them all. No nation’s flag would find a higher place than any other. Yet I recently saw an ad for a patriotic church service celebrating Independence Day with the title, “The Stars and Stripes Forever.” What’s wrong with this picture?

Such programs betray a fundamental lack of clear theological thinking among many Christians in the U.S.

church flagWhat is the Church, in relation to our identities as members of nations?

In 2 Corinthians 5:20, Paul identifies Christians as ambassadors for Christ.” Let’s explore this one metaphor for a moment. A church sanctuary where Christians gather to worship is like an embassy, a consulate, a diplomatic mission, a foreign space marked out in the territory of whatever nation and community it finds itself.

Here’s how our government describes the relationship of an embassy to its host country:

While diplomatic spaces remain the territory of the host state, an embassy or consulate represents a sovereign state. International rules do not allow representatives of the host country to enter an embassy without permission –even to put out a fire — and designate an attack on an embassy as an attack on the country it represents.

That is a description akin to what Jesus said: “In the world but not of the world.”

As a diplomatic mission of the Kingdom of God, our churches represent the homeland to our host countries and work to foster bilateral relations. The U.S. diplomatic website linked above describes the U.S.A.’s consulates as: “the public face of the United States of America in the host country.” In the same way, the Church is the public face of the Kingdom of Heaven to our nation, the United States of America, and it is not fitting for us to act as though our ultimate loyalty is to our host country or to mingle loyalties to such an extent that they are indistinguishable.

When we go to worship, we enter holy space, space set apart to represent and honor our King and our true homeland. The symbols we use and activities that we participate in there should reflect that. We in the U.S. certainly give thanks that we have received a welcome and that we are free to conduct Heaven’s business herein, and we do our level best to maintain good, strong relations with our host country. We pray for that. But we do not imagine that we are here to be absorbed into our host and to become its representatives, to celebrate its patriotic customs in our sanctuaries as though that is part and parcel of why we exist as the Church.

Indeed, patriotic holidays provide one of those opportunities for Christian people to move out of the sanctuary and into our communities, to stand side by side with our neighbors, acknowledging blessings we share in common as Americans. Patriotism is not a specifically Christian duty. However, as fellow human beings, members of a common society and culture, we can honor our heritage and our freedom, have fun with our neighbors, sing patriotic songs and wave the flag, watch fireworks, and eat hot dogs and drink lemonade together. We celebrate common grace in common spaces with everyone who enjoys these gifts.

Then those of us who want to can go to church, focus our attention on Jesus, breathe the air of God’s Kingdom, and pray “Thy Kingdom come, thy will be done in this nation and in all nations as in heaven.”

Saturday Ramblings, July 5, 2014, The Tim Howard Edition

Welcome to the Tim Howard edition of the Ramblings, fellow imonkers. Yes, team USA lost to Belgium on Tuesday, but goal-keeper Tim Howard made 16 saves, the most since they began keeping track (in 1966).   20 years ago he would have had a few nice newspaper clippings to but on his bulletin board.  This being the internet age, Howard’s feat immediately became a meme: Things that Tim Howard could have saved.  For your viewing enjoyment, I will sprinkle some of them throughout the post, starting here:  BrkdBLdCAAEFTH1

And some other countries had teams playing soccer.  Apparently.  Argentina faced Switzerland in an elimination round on Tuesday.  “It will be war” Pope Francis joked with his Swiss guards.  He declined their invitation to watch the match with them,  but did make a bet on the game with them. The Swiss lost due to some (probable) divine interference, and the guards now have to wear Team Argentina colors till the next World Cup.  If the Swiss had won the Vatican would have been relocated to Zurich.

"Remember, Francis, I know where you sleep"
“Remember, Francis, I know where you sleep”

In other sports news, the Chicago White Sox gave out rain ponchos to their fans Wednesday night.  They might want to re-think the color…sox

Religious liberty loomed large on the legal landscape this week, but I don’t want to talk about the Hobby Lobby case, and if you start up in the comments I will call PETA, cuz you are beating a dead horse.   A more interesting case, and one much less commented upon, was across the pond, where the  European Court on Human Rights upheld France’s ban on veils which cover the face.  A 24 year old French Muslim woman brought the suit, alleging that the ban violated her freedom of expression and religion.  The court gave two reasons for upholding the ban.  The first was security, since a person with a full veil cannot be identified.  The second reason was more oblique: “The Court was also able to understand the view that individuals might not wish to see, in places open to all, practices or attitudes which would fundamentally call into question the possibility of open interpersonal relationships, which, by virtue of an established consensus, formed an indispensable element of community life within the society in question.”  In other words, other people have a right to see your face in public.  I’m with the Muslim woman on this one. What do you think, imonkers?

By the way, Europe’s highest Rabbi (who knew this was a thing?) is strongly opposed to the ban, and says that religious liberty in Europe is “unraveling before our eyes”.

 

meme9_2961660k (1)

“Its not about how many people I tackle each day. It’s not about how many hundreds of millions [communion] cups we sell at the end of the day.”  Not a quote you run into often.  It was made by Israel Idonije, a football player recently cut from the Chicago Bears.  His new line of work: selling pre-filled communion cups.  These are machine packaged, and are available with a wafer sealed in.   Idonije says beyond the issue of convenience, sales are increasing because of concerns over germs.  You don’t have to worry about someone sneezing or coughing near the elements, and the only hands that touch the elements are yours.RNS-BLESSED-COMMUNION

Pope Francis this week called landmines “weapons of cowards”.  And this week the U.S. this week  indicated that it will likely join the 161 other nations who have signed the Ottawa Convention outlawing the possession and use of mines.

BrhM6acCUAABtcP

This is all kinds of awesome. Hessy Taff was a six months old infant in Germany in 1935 when she had her pictures taken. Unbeknownst the her family, the photographer entered her photo in a contest designed to find the “perfect Aryan baby”;  Hessy’s picture won, and was re-printed in all sorts of Nazi propaganda.  Hessy is still alive, and this month presented the Yad Vashem Holocaust Memorial in Israel with a Nazi magazine featuring her baby photograph on the front cover.  Why the presentation to the Jewish Museum?  Because Hessy Taff, the “perfect Aryan baby”, …is a Jew. hessy02_2960553b

My son is living in Israel right now, so the recent troubles there have gotten my attention most profoundly.  I am speaking, of course, about the three Israeli teens who were kidnapped and murdered, and the Palestinian teen who met the same fate (probably as revenge).  A leading Rabbi is being urged to resign his post as secretary general of the World B’nei Akiva movement after he put up a Facebook post calling for Palestinian blood, and suggesting that “300 Philistine foreskins” would be a good place to start.

 

tim-howard-save-memes1-570x357

Alabama Pastor Ricky Martin volunteers as a chaplain in a state prison, and in that context has met many sex-offenders who had no place to live when they got out. Martin came up with the idea of a sex offender refuge in rural Chilton County, far away from any schools or daycare centers, and began screening parolees to live there.  Over the years over 50 men have found temporary shelter there (usually about a half-dozen at a time) and none of them have been picked up for another crime.  This week the state legislature passed a bill  that prohibits “more than two convicted sex offenders from living within 300 feet of each other on the same property unless they are married.”  Coincidentally, the bill only takes effect in the county where Martin and his camp reside.  

BriNMwQIIAA2KSJ

Oh my.  A new poll finds that Americans think Barack Obama is the worst president since the Second World War.  Somewhere even Richard Nixon is a little amazed at this one.  They say that fools march in where angels fear to tread, so let me prove that proverb true by asking you, fellow imonkers, to give your opinion on this.  How would you rate (by your own subjective criteria) the presidents since WW2?  Give us a list, then a short explanation of your criteria (or criterion if you only have one and are linguistically picky).   Non-U.S. readers, we need your perspective, too.Now, play nice, and no-name calling (leave that to the youtube comment section).  Just to show my fearlessness (or foolishness), I will start:

1. Eisenhower
2. Truman
3. Reagan
4. Carter
5. Clinton
6. Obama
7. Bush I
8. Ford
9. Bush 2
10. Johnson
11. Nixon
12. Kennedy

My criteria is not based on how much I agree with each president’s viewpoints, but how effective I think they were as presidents, especially in the area of foreign policy.  Foreign policy trumps domestic for me for this simple reason: With foreign policy the president, since world war 2, has had almost unlimited control and his decisions have affected the whole world.   I also downgraded presidents I thought were corrupt or just jerks (looking at you, Lyndon) because the president is in some ways a symbol of the country.  And because I don’t like jerks.

BriNY1sCMAAGecd

Kudos to the best satire I’ve read in a while: How to Breastfeed Appropriately.  Here is Tip #5: “Get some morals. Do you have sex in public? No. Then why would you pull out your SEX BREASTS for your baby in public? Just because something is natural, doesn’t mean we all want to see it. Yes, we will tolerate a celebrity nip slip or areola display. Yes, there are breasts splashed all over magazine racks and on television bouncing up and down to pop music, but that’s different. We’re OK with boobs if money has been exchanged. Has your cheap baby paid you? No? Then wrap it up.”

Tyler Perry has won a trademark battle this week.  The prize? The right to copyright the phrase, “What would Jesus Do”.  Presumably this would only apply to potential movies and reality shows.  Chaplain Mike, your WWJD belt buckle and early 90’s t-shirts are still safe (I think).

BriPQIOCYAAZCr8

A columnist for Ministry Today, after hearing preachers brag about how “practical” their messages are, asks this question: Where do pastors get the idea that the Bible is practical? “The drama of a God who allowed His Son to become a sacrifice to redeem the entire human race is the least practical thing I’ve ever heard. The story of redemption isn’t practical at all. If you want practical, then you’re looking in the wrong place. The incarnation, the mystery of salvation, the power of miracles, how the gospel message transforms lives—all those things aren’t the least bit practical. And how about the Sermon on the Mount? And turning the other cheek?”  what do you think, fellow imonkers: should sermons seek to be “practical”, and if so, then in what ways?

Disturbing headline of the week: What you Need to Know about the Coming Jellyfish Apocalypse.

Well, that’s it for the Tim Howard edition of the Ramblings.  I will just leave one final image.

Not that I want Cub fans to re-live painful memories...
Not that I want Cub fans to re-live painful memories…

 

Religious Switching and Metaphor

religiousswitching2

Five years ago I created and published the above graph at Internet Monk. It was based on a very large survey by the Pew Forum that showed how people had switched from their childhood faith group to their current faith group. If you have trouble understanding the graph, you may want to read the original analysis. I am showing it again now, because I think it is relevant to our discussion.

Just about two weeks ago there was a post that compared Evangelical Christianity to Caffeine Free Diet Coke:

Today, Coke has become a drink that does not quench thirst, does not provide any stimulant and whose strange taste is not particularly satisfying. Nonetheless, it is the most consumed beverage in the world. It plays on the mysterious enjoyment we get out of consuming it as something to enjoy in surplus after we have already quenched our thirst. We drink Coke because “Coke is “it”” not because it satisfies anything material. In essence, all that remains of what was once Coke is a pure semblance, an artificial promise of a substance which never materialized. In Zizek’s words, we ‘drink nothing in the guise of something …” It is “in effect merely an envelope of a void.”(22-23).

When you look at the graph you will see a broad yellow band across the middle of the page. It represents those who were raised Evangelical and still remain Evangelical. The narrower yellow bands represent many of those who comment at Internet Monk. They may have grown up in the evangelical church, but they now identify elsewhere, or no where at all. These people would tend to agree with the quote above, and that Evangelical Christianity does not provide any stimulant and is not particularly satisfying.

However, like Diet Coke, Evangelicals still has the biggest appeal among the three major religious grouping listed. (Sorry Orthodox readers, but your numbers were too small to get your own grouping. You have been included in the “other” section.)

What you do need to realize it that when you “diss” caffeine free diet coke, you are putting down my drink of choice. And, while I do have one foot in the post-evangelical wilderness, I am not headed in the direction of liturgical style worship.

Don’t get me wrong. I think liturgical style worship has many redeeming qualities. If you read last week’s post on “Cigar City Hunahpu’s Imperial Stout – Double Barrel Aged: A Metaphor for Liturgy” you will notice that I had only positive things to say about that particular beer. Why? Because generally I have only positive things to say about liturgical worship. How did I come up with the name of the beer? I went to rankbeer.com (yes such a place exists) and I pulled down the number one ranked beer. What I was trying to communicate was that I was not trying to compare liturgy to some ho-hum drink, but rather the number one beer on rankbeer.com!

It is not like I don’t have exposure to liturgy: My wife sings in a very liturgical choir, my sister-in-law is an elder in a liturgical church, and I have been to countless liturgical services over the years. I do have a theology degree, so it isn’t like I don’t understand the significance of what I am seeing and hearing. But liturgical services leave me spiritually dry and desiring a taste of something else. I have the same reaction to beer. All beer.

If you look at the graph above again, I would represent a little squiggly yellow line at the top which is not sure where it is going to end up at the bottom. I know it is not going to be in a liturgical service, but that doesn’t leave me a whole lot of options. If I was to create this graph ten years from now and find my place on it, my best guess it would probably be in a Anabaptist/Mennonite tradition that spans the Evangelical and Mainline worlds.

So I wrote this post to remind us that while some of us in the Post Evangelical Wilderness will find their destinations in Liturgical traditions (Denise Spencer, Jeff Dunn, and Chaplain Mike are all examples of this), many of us will have great difficulty in going that direction. Some may remain in their own Evangelical traditions, grouse about the taste of Caffeine Free Diet Coke, but still continue to drink it. Others may look to some other beverage entirely.

The other thing I would like us to think about from the graph above (though not the purpose of my original metaphor) is that while most of us have come to a spiritual wilderness out of Evangelical traditions, many come to a spiritual wilderness out of liturgical traditions. While it is not the purpose or direction of this blog to focus on this area, it is wise for us to remember that others may need different solutions than the ones we are offering.

Your thoughts and comments are welcome.

Daniel Grothe: The Spiritual Discipline of Scribbling

legalpad

The Spiritual Discipline of Scribbling
by Daniel Grothe

A few years ago, I began preaching weekly—an invigorating, and simultaneously daunting and demanding, task. Previously, I had the good fortune of being an occasional preacher, filling in for people who were on vacation or who turned up sick. As a fill-in, very often you get to preach your “greatest hits”—the sermons that are in you, the ones you could stand up and preach without notes, the ones that you are confident will be a Home Run—whatever that might mean, anyway.

As any weekly preacher knows when she/he steps out of the pulpit on Sunday afternoon, the clock is ticking. Next Sunday will be here in no time. Which means a sermon must be prepared.

So, what did I do in my transition from fill-in preacher to weekly preacher? I became an apprentice in the Spiritual Discipline of Scribbling.

I bought a stack of pocket-sized notebooks so that I could have one with me everywhere I go. I bought a case of legal pads and kept one on my desk at all times. My baseline assumption became, I’ll never be able to scribble too much. You just don’t know when a fruitful thought might come to you.

I began to practice for spontaneity, working to “turn a phrase” that I found recurring in the text. I would try to translate the phrase in three or four different ways, not because I was going to use that in my sermon, but because I wanted to develop facility with these words. I would draw a picture of what I thought the text was saying–even though I’m a terrible “artist”. A goal for the preacher is to have internalized these words so much that they naturally begin to find shape on the tongue.

I would attempt to craft transition sentences that would thread two seemingly independent thoughts into a seamless whole. These segue sentences would serve as the hinge on which my sermon would turn.

My point here is that spontaneity is anything but spontaneous, whether you’re a preacher or a jazz saxophonist. It is a skill one deliberately develops. Wynton Marsalis can improvise only because he’s internalized every scale and is intimately acquainted with all the jazz standards.

Words are like a thousand little puzzle pieces—pretty random when strewn about on the table, but beautiful when organized, shaped, placed properly so that a larger picture can be seen.

My contention is that regular doodling with words can serve as a development of linguistic “muscle memory” so that when a situation arises and a word is needed, one will be “in shape”, one will be prepared.

Eleventh-century Christian mystic, Meister Eckhart, famously wrote, “Only the hand that erases can write the true thing.” The assumption he makes is that one will have something to erase. One is writing more than what is necessary. Thus, it stands to reason that the hand that does not have something to erase will never write the true thing.

So we jot, sketch, chicken-scratch, draw, paint and design ourselves ever deeper into the mysteries. And in doing so fewer of our words will “fall to the ground.”

I thank the Creator for every night Teresa of Avila stayed up late praying, grappling with God and endeavoring to write something true. Because she did, the church is more prepared to live faithfully. I praise God for all the hours John and Charles Wesley spent crafting hymns that have served the church for 300 years. Because they did, we can know what to sing whether we’ve “gone up to the heavens” or “made our bed in Sheol.” We won’t forget the effort that people like Flannery O’Connor and Henri Nouwen exerted for our benefit. And these are a just few in a long line of sacred scribblers.

I find it interesting that over and over again God told the prophets and apostles to “write this down” (Exod. 17:14; Ps. 102:18; Hab. 2:2; Rev. 1:19, 19:9-11, 21:5). Writing is a part of our Christian identity. “Chicken-scratching” our way toward faithfulness is a family tradition.

As each new generation is summoned to probe into the vast terrain of the Triune God, I have a sneaking suspicion that we’re going to need to order a few more legal pads.

• • •

Daniel blogs at Edging into the Mysteries

The Great Methodological Heresy

ww1 mad brute posterLet me say it at the start: I don’t give a rat’s tail about the “Hobby Lobby” case that the Supreme Court decided the other day.

I don’t buy the Chicken Little mania of the progressives who think the sky of freedom and protection for women is falling.

Nor do I buy the triumphalistic crowing of the conservatives who are hailing this as a monumental victory for religious liberty.

The culture wars exhaust me.

Oh sure, on some level I’ll try to stay informed, but when are we going to stop letting media pundits and propagandists define what’s important and what we should give our attention to?

As I said in a comment the other day, I watch no cable news, nor do I give a minute to any of the smart asses on the right or left who comment on the news. I can’t afford to.

Who has time to soak up all that blather and bluster? No wonder people seem so angry all the time. And Christians often come across as angriest.

Do you know what scares me most?

When Christians think they must win in order to win.

This is the great methodological heresy — that Christians win by winning.

Sometimes it’s the conservative Christians fighting for morality and individual freedom and sometimes it is the progressive Christians fighting to uphold the social contract so that groups they deem oppressed can gain their version of justice.

Many of the causes for which culture warriors fight are good. Many of the methods they use to fight for them are not. And when one side or the other wins a battle that advances their cause, the triumphalistic pronouncements that follow are often hard to stomach. You read headlines like:

The left’s hysteria over the Hobby Lobby decision

The Supreme Court defended religious liberty in the Hobby Lobby case; it didn’t ban birth control

Feminist Outrage Over Hobby Lobby Is A ‘Cynical Game’

Of course, these are then answered by wailing and lamentation from other side:

Ginsburg Got It Right: Poor Women Are Getting Screwed By Hobby Lobby

Hobby Lobby ruling jeopardizes women’s health

A minefield of extreme religious liberty

Guess what? Next week few will be talking publicly about this anymore. But now, by God, this case is being touted as the linchpin of all that is sacred by every screaming mimi out there with a strong opinion one way or the other.

Both sides have bought into the “war” imagery and mentality. What matters is that we win and our “enemies” lose. What matters is that we gain power to implement what we think is right and that we strip our opponents of power so that they can’t. How we get there, well, let’s not talk about that. All’s fair . . .

wargb013But didn’t the Apostle say, “Love . . . does not rejoice in wrongdoing, but rejoices in the truth”?

True enough, but it doesn’t say that love gloats. Love doesn’t rub the opponent’s face in it. Love doesn’t dance around singing “We Are the Champions” and waving banners. Love doesn’t imitate the Roman triumph, a victory parade in which the vanquished were put on display, shackled and shamed, before the swaggering crowds.

But that’s the natural result of making winning the goal and of thinking that you achieve that goal by triumphing over the opposition.

If Jesus taught us anything, it’s that his followers win by losing.

By laying down our lives for our neighbors.

By loving our enemies, turning the other cheek, going the extra mile, praying for our persecutors — doing the counter-intuitive thing, the unnatural thing, the dying thing, the cross thing.

For the life of me, I’ve never been able to see how to be a soldier in the culture wars and do that.

IM Book Review: An Agnostic Apocalypse

the-leftovers-ribbon

What would happen in the world, in the church, in our lives, if an event like the Rapture took place, but the event was completely enigmatic?

What if hundreds of millions of people around the globe suddenly disappeared, but there was no rhyme or reason as to who was “taken” and who was “left behind”?

Some Christians believe the Bible teaches a pretribulation Rapture of the church. In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, Jesus will come back, raise the Christian dead, and cause true believers living on earth to ascend into the clouds to meet him. He will take them to heaven where they will await the outcome of seven years of tribulation on earth under the rule of the Antichrist. A climactic battle at Armageddon will lead to the glorious return of Christ to judge his enemies, set up his throne in Jerusalem, and inaugurate a thousand year reign of righteousness and peace on earth.

Tom Perotta, in his novel The Leftovers, imagines a different scenario. Christians who look for the Rapture see it as one of the ultimate clarifying events. But in The Leftovers, a Rapture-like event — “the Sudden Departure” — only raises a host of unanswerable questions. In this story, “God hadn’t factored religion into His decision-making,” and all manner of people, from babies to the elderly, Christians to Hindus to atheists, righteous and unrighteous alike, vanish without a trace and with no evidence of any design or logic behind their disappearance. And those who remain have to try and make some sense of it all.

As far as anyone could tell, it was a random harvest, and the one thing the Rapture couldn’t be was random. The whole point was to separate the wheat from the chaff, to reward the true believers and put the rest of the world on notice. An indiscriminate Rapture was no Rapture at all. (p. 3)

Perotta envisions all manner of grief responses to the Sudden Departure in The Leftovers. In an interview, the author said the book “became an examination of collective grief, and I realized I was writing about a search for meaning in the wake of a terrible mystery. What would an authentic contemporary American religious upheaval look like?”

Rapture-believing Christians in the story, of course, were puzzled and confused by the Great Departure. Rev. Matt Jamison, formerly of Zion Bible Church, became one of the staunchest “Rapture-Deniers.” He made it his mission to prove the difference between the scriptural prophecies and what had taken place. Jamison published a newsletter and made sure it got distributed around town, revealing damning facts about local individuals who had disappeared in order to show that they were neither Christians nor virtuous people. It couldn’t have been the Rapture! look at all the sinners that were taken! was his argument.

The bulk of the story focuses on individual and family grief responses by describing what happened in the household of Kevin Garvey, mayor of the small town of Mapleton, three years after the startling disappearances.

Kevin’s son Tom left home and became attached to a cult leader who promised healing but abused his power seducing many young women who fell under his spell. Tom accompanies one of those girls, a pregnant coworker in the cult, on a trip across the country disguised as “Barefoot People” a reinvigorated hippie movement with religious overtones.

Kevin’s wife also parted, but stayed in town and joined the Guilty Remnant, a white-garbed, cigarette smoking group of ascetics that silently confronted people to make them feel uncomfortable about pursuing normal lives after the Departure. Their mission was to “resist the so-called Return to Normalcy, the day-to-day process of forgetting the Rapture, or, at the very least, of consigning it to the past, treating it as a part of the ongoing fabric of human history, rather than the cataclysm that had brought history to an end” (p. 207).

Kevin’s academically gifted daughter Jill began staying out every night and partying with all the kids around town who had no more interest in school or whatever future high achievement might offer them. They no longer saw the point.

As mayor, Kevin tried to help the town move past the tragedy by staging a “Heroes Day” parade in town, but when life turned into coming home to a mostly empty house he wondered if he himself would ever know joy or normalcy again. Kevin and the most bereaved person in town, a woman named Nora who lost her entire family in an instant, went through the motions trying to make a tentative connection only to find that the way was murky and uncertain.

* * *

Uncertainty forms the very atmosphere of The Leftovers. That is what made it intriguing reading for me. It forced me to ponder God’s ways, which, when you think about it, are almost always mysterious, subject to a variety of interpretations, and contrary to human expectations.

The fundamentalists would have us believe otherwise, for fundamentalism is all about thinking that Truth (with a capital “T”) is as clear as the nose on your face and that God is in the business of making himself known in obvious and incontrovertible ways every day.

What world do they live in? What Bible are they reading?

Of course, there is a fundamentalism of uncertainty as well. One wise teacher warns us not to let the wilderness become our “destination, where . . . questions and confusion are “baptized,” where uncertainty becomes the new certainty, where coloring outside the lines becomes a new arrogant and self-righteous identity.”

But we must acknowledge that even Jesus’ resurrection, the sine qua non event upon which we base our faith, was not a glorious public event designed to convince the masses immediately and without any more doubt that his claims were true. He appeared to his disciples, who in turn became his witnesses, and we must rely upon their word of testimony for our good news.

It does not seem that God is in the business of overwhelming us with clarity, to say the least.

So I appreciate The Leftovers. It provides believers with an interesting thought experiment. The first coming of Jesus the Messiah did not happen according to human expectations and people have been arguing for two millennia about what it all means. What if God’s future interventions turn out to be just as confounding?

How might we respond?

* * *

The Leftovers has been made into a series that premiered last Sunday on HBO. Here is the trailer:

<

Another Look: Worship as a Meal Gathering

 

imageThe following was part of a 2011 post, The Order of Christian Worship. It has been edited and updated.

* * *

The liturgy, the historic worship order in the Western Church, makes sense to me as a pattern for meeting with God and focusing my attention on Christ and the Gospel.

It seems to me like what would happen if I were to receive an invitation to a banquet at a king’s palace. There would be a protocol, set up by the king’s staff, for guests to follow. We would enter the palace and show our respect and gratitude for being invited. We would be introduced to the king and he would address us as his citizens. We would sit down at the banquet table and he would lead us in partaking of the feast prepared for his honor and our blessing. We would be dismissed in peace to go and live as his loyal subjects.

If that sounds too formal and “high church” for you, then think of it like this. The same pattern would hold if my wife and I were invited to the home of dear friends. When we arrived, we would be greeted at the door and as we entered we would say, “Thanks for having us over; boy, that sure smells good; I love what you’ve done with your house” — we would offer words of thanks and praise. Before dinner was served, we might sit down in the living room or out on the deck together. We would catch up with one another through conversation. Then, summoned to the table, we would sit down as guests and enjoy the meal our friends had prepared and served us. Finally, after more conversation, we would bid them goodnight, saying, “We must do this more often. We’ll be in touch.” We would go home, hearts warmed after a time of renewing a special relationship and hoping to strengthen those bonds in the days to come.

We gather.

We share words.

We share a meal.

We depart, renewed.

And in case some of you are automatically thinking this is about being “high church” or participating in elaborate rituals or following suffocating formalities, forget it. It’s just a simple pattern that can be worked out with as much or as little fanfare as a congregation desires. It can contain any style of music, any number of creative elements, and it can fit any cultural setting.

It’s just the way we meet with God.

The Evangelical Liturgy

liturgyThis post was going to be a followup to Friday’s post – , but then I got unexpectedly called into work for an extended period of time. I do want to continue on this theme, but with the time I had left I could not do it justice. I will be following up with Chaplain Mike on when I can best complete this.

Instead, I was drawn to one of the comments of Friday’s post in which the writer reminded us that Evangelicals have liturgy too: It just looks quite different. This in turn reminded me of Michael Spencer’s series on Evangelical liturgy which we have mentioned a few times over the last several years. I realized that we had no “table of contents” to the entire series, so I thought I would redeem the time and create one here.

Introduction
1. The Worship Setting
2. The Tools
3. The Leaders
4. The Congregation
5. The Prelude
6. The Call To Worship
7. The Invocation
8. The Public Reading of Scripture
9. Singing
10. The Children’s Sermon
11. The Corporate Confession
12. The Assurance of Pardon
13. The Offering
14. The Sermon
15. The Creeds
16. Baptism
17. The Lord’s Supper
18. The Prayers of the People
19. The Pastoral Prayer
20. Silence
21. The Invitation
22. The Benediction
23. The Postlude

I would encourage you to read the introduction and then read and comment on whichever of the twenty three elements catches your attention.

Learning to Walk in the Liturgy

monastery walk

“For the things we have to learn before we can do them, we learn by doing them.”

― Aristotle, The Nicomachean Ethics

* * *

On Friday in the comments to Mike Bell’s post, Danielle wrote:

I would love to see IM discuss how to make liturgy more accessible to newcomers.

I would also love to see IM discuss how one helps children to relate to it – or any church context, for that matter. As the parent of a toddler, I pose this question to myself all the time. But I didn’t spend much of my childhood in church, so I have no direct experience with what it is like to be very young and in church.

Last week I was watching my grandson play baseball and, being the old-timer that I am, I entered one of the those philosophical discussions with one of the dads about the state of youth baseball that seems to happen regularly at the park. He thought the kids were being over-coached, and I agreed.

Mea culpa — I used to do that too when I coached, but now that I’m a spectator, I conveniently forget that and reserve the right as an American and former baseball guy to become a “pundit” and to pass judgment on the way my grandson is being trained up. A “pundit,” by the way, is someone who couldn’t do what the person he is critiquing is doing, even if his life depended on it. In sports, pundits are usually older, washed-up guys like me.

Anyway, our conversation followed the usual path until we reached what I think is the golden explanation for most of the madness I complain about with regard to kid’s sports: Children don’t play unorganized sports anymore. When I was a boy, the driveways, backyards, streets and open lots in our neighborhood were our stadiums. And it seems to me, at least in my memory, that we played a full schedule of games in those humble settings.

The friends I had were all sports fans. We watched our favorite teams and players on TV or at local games, then we went out and tried to imitate them in our pick-up games. At any given moment, I might be Sandy Koufax breaking off a sharp curveball or Mickey Mantle sending a shot out of the park. We mimicked their batting stances, their pitching motions, and the way the fielders we liked caught, threw, and ran. I imitated Ron Santo, rubbing dirt all over my hands, wrists and forearms before I stepped in to swing the bat. We even copied the play-by-play broadcasters’ voices and phrases, announcing it to the whole neighborhood when we did something in the game. So it was with every sport we played.

And that’s how we learned.

Continue reading “Learning to Walk in the Liturgy”

Saturday Ramblings, June 28, 2014

Welcome to the weekend, fellow imonkers.

Cleveland_Indians_logo.svg_
Totally not racist

I’m always surprised by which Rambling items generate the most discussion. Last week it was the Patent Court throwing out the trademark of the Washington Redskins.  Some commentators wondered if Cleveland’s Chief Wahoo was next on the chopping block, and that may indeed be the case.  “It’s been offensive since day one,” Robert Roche, a Chiricahua Apache, told NBC News. “We are not mascots. My children are not mascots. We are people.

Uruguayan futbol player Luis Suarez will miss the rest of the World Cup because of a four month suspension.  His crime: biting an opposing player on the shoulder, which is apparently apparently against the rules (this being soccer I’m really not sure). This is actually the third time in the last few years that Suarez has bitten another player on the field.  But hey, at least Suarez has sympathizers out there: 3cb

I think Ann Coulter was being serious.  I haven’t read her column before, so I could be wrong. And I hope I am.  Coulter published a piece with a very clear premise:” any growing interest in soccer can only be a sign of the nation’s moral decay. ” Okaaaaayyyy…..Ms. Coulter, what exactly are your arguments?

  1. Individual achievement is not a big factor in soccer
  2. Liberal moms like soccer because it’s a sport in which athletic talent finds so little expression that girls can play with boys. No serious sport is co-ed, even at the kindergarten level.
  3. No other “sport” ends in as many scoreless ties as soccer.
  4. The prospect of either personal humiliation or major injury is required to count as a sport. Most sports are sublimated warfare.
  5. You can’t use your hands in soccer…. What sets man apart from the lesser beasts, besides a soul, is that we have opposable thumbs.
  6. I resent the force-fed aspect of soccer.
  7. It’s foreign.
  8. Soccer is like the metric system, which liberals also adore because it’s European. Naturally, the metric system emerged from the French Revolution, during the brief intervals when they weren’t committing mass murder by guillotine.

These are all exact quotes by the way.  Really.  I promise.  Just click on the link, I swear she really said this. Her final point, by the way, is to make all the above rather irrelevant because “Soccer is not ‘catching on’…

And by the way, doesn’t the World Cup logo look like a face palm?  Were they thinking of Coulter when they designed it?

face

Continue reading “Saturday Ramblings, June 28, 2014”