CM: I’m sorry I haven’t been able to moderate as closely as I’d hoped today. I’m going to close the comments. I think we’ve covered this enough for now. I’m more convinced than ever that we as Christians are going to have to learn to talk about issues like this in more loving and helpful ways. We’ll give it another try soon.
. . .
As I have been driving around the city lately, I’ve noticed billboards for a “new” church. The slogans are catchy and direct people to their website. So I checked it out.
The billboards are advertising a name change for a congregation that emphasizes ministry to the LBGT communities. They are a fully “affirming” church, in fact, the original congregation was founded by 18 gay believers who felt unwelcome in other churches. They are known for their intentional outreach to and inclusion of LBGT folks, and this ministry has come to define them.
But now, in their informational and promotional materials, they report that they are trying to broaden their appeal and become known as an “Emerging Church” that goes beyond the old categories of thinking, welcoming all people, celebrating diversity, and encouraging independent thought.
…our Vision is to become one of the world’s foremost Emerging Churches, then share that model of ministry with others, ultimately affecting the course of the global Christian movement.
Although there is no one fixed definition of an “Emerging Church,” we define it as a church that operates in accordance with the Guiding Principles listed above.
Congregations who self-identify as Emerging Churches are generally motivated by a deep desire to move beyond the conservative/liberal divide that has come to characterize modern Christianity and get back to focusing on the basics of following Jesus, as presented in the Holy Gospels. Emerging Churches encourage honest questions and allow room for freedom of thought and conscience.
What interested me as a subject of discussion was their statement in which they contrast their vision with that of “traditional, institutional” churches. In essence, they are saying that many churches today are not presenting the true Jesus, while their aim is to recover an accurate presentation of who he is and what he came to do. Here’s the statement:
There is a huge gap between how Jesus is described in the Bible and how he’s often presented in many churches. It’s almost as if the real Jesus (generous and loving) has been kidnapped, and a false Jesus (mean and judgmental) has been trotted out in his place. At ____________ Church, we’re under no illusion that we’ve got it all figured out. But we are genuinely concerned and want to spark an honest dialogue.
Consider the evidence:
- The real Jesus taught that his followers should take a flexible approach, doing what love requires in any situation (Matthew 22:34-40; Mark 3:1-6). Many churches today teach that rules are more important than love.
- The real Jesus offered hope (Luke 4:18-19); one of his most common statements was, “Be not afraid” (Luke 12:32). Many churches today actively promote fear.
- The real Jesus defended sinners from attack (John 8:1-11). Many churches today lead the charge against them.
- The real Jesus empowered women spiritually (Luke 8:1-4; John 20:11-18). Many churches today teach that only men are worthy of spiritual leadership.
- The real Jesus encouraged simple living (Luke 12:13-34). Many churches today celebrate flashy materialism.
- The real Jesus celebrated diversity in God’s creation, including gay and transgender people (Matthew 8:5-13; Matthew 19:1-12). Many churches today call diversity an abomination.
- The real Jesus boldly crossed racial and ethnic boundaries (John 4:1-30; Luke 10:25-37). Many churches today are segregated by race and ethnicity.
- The real Jesus celebrated life and loved having a good time (Matthew 11:16-19). His first miracle was to create wine (John 2:1-11). Many churches today give the impression that fun is dangerous.
The list could go on and on. There’s a huge gap between the real Jesus and the Jesus often presented by institutional Christianity.
Now, it is no secret that Internet Monk has a well-earned reputation for being critical of the church, especially in its lack of a “Jesus-shaped” spirituality.
But I would like to know what you think about this statement, the contrasts it draws, the criticisms it levels against the traditional church, and the vision of Jesus it promotes.
WARNING: I am not going to tolerate belligerent behavior in the comments. Speak clearly, speak directly, and feel free to express your opinions strongly. However, keep in within the bounds of courtesy and respect. Any questioning of salvation or use of demeaning language is strictly prohibited and I will not hesitate to “trash” offensive comments.










