You have been reading posts about the Beatitudes this week. If you would like to hear my sermon from this morning on Matthew 5:1-12, you can do so using the player below.
This sermon is about 22 minutes long.
You have been reading posts about the Beatitudes this week. If you would like to hear my sermon from this morning on Matthew 5:1-12, you can do so using the player below.
This sermon is about 22 minutes long.

By Chaplain Mike
– Today’s Gospel: Matthew 5:1-12
so many people here to hear him
from everywhere, of every kind
no religious crowd this one!
check out that bloke over there
loser if i’ve ever seen one
not an ounce of righteousness in him
wouldn’t know a tithe from a toothbrush
couldn’t find genesis if you handed him a bible
a rough time of it, he’s had
surely the teacher won’t waste any time on him
and look over there, what a pitiful wretch
if it weren’t for bad luck, she’d have no luck
grim reaper took her husband
then came after her child
it got so nobody knew what to say to her
couldn’t take hearin’ another bit o’ bad news
you rarely see her out and about any more
and have you seen all the yokels?
brought ’em out of their shacks, he did
i’ll wager they’re lookin’ for a free show —
funny talk, a miracle or two —
keep ’em happy for a year!
sure thing they don’t have much more
i’m surprised their masters gave ’em an afternoon
hey, there’s the widow lady from town
she sure got a bad shake didn’t she?
thought her husband had set things up for her
then some shyster tricked her out of it
got her to sign some paper
thinkin’ she was makin’ her money secure
secure in his pocket, all right!
and there’s a bunch of people here
been tryin’ to help these folks
takin’ pity on ’em
tryin’ to make ’em religious
tryin’ to get ’em to quit their fightin’
carin’ even when the door gets slammed in their faces
spinnin’ their wheels, gettin’ nowhere
seems like what we have here
is a big ol’ loser’s convention
not your ideal crowd, i’d say
then jesus stood up
looked around, and said to the lot of them
“you, above all, are blessed”

Classic iMonk Post
by Michael Spencer
From Feb 5, 2009
Let’s say you’re sitting around talking with a group of friends, some of whom are Christians and some aren’t.
A subject comes up; for example, marriage. People share their stories, their thoughts, their accumulated wisdom.
After a moment, one of the Christians present begins to speak. He speaks longer. His tone is different. He’s quoting verses…and more verses.
There’s a sense of finality and authority to this talk. You can sense a reaction, even before anyone says anything.
Some present are annoyed. Some are angry. Some want to move on to a topic as far away from the Bible as possible.
Then another Christian speaks. This person validates that the quoted verses are crucial and important for Christians to understand. But this person raises questions. She interacts with the scripture AND with the comments of the other participants. From ideas in the verses- like submission, for instance- she asks the group to explore what submission might mean in a non-abusive context?
The room relaxes a bit. This Christian wasn’t authoritative. She wasn’t ending the discussion. She was continuing it. She was curious. She didn’t have all the answers, but still had questions. She wanted to listen to others; to hear their insights and experiences.
Somehow, this second Christian seemed to think Christianly, but to think differently. The scripture was the beginning of her thought process; a place to launch out from, not just a place to stop.
Of course, when the evening is over and everyone is walking out to their car, the first Christian stops the second, reads her more verses and suggests she may not be a Christian.
(I know….that was ugly. I’m sorry.)
Continue reading “iMonk Classic: Believing the Bible: A Place To Start or Stop?”
Where did the week go? Seems like just yesterday it was Saturday. I guess they come most every week, huh? Around here we use Saturdays as a general tidying-up day. This week I’ve cleaning up my brains, the same ones that got battered around after a couple of essays I posted. Y’all are a tough crowd, you know that? Oh well … what say we ramble.
Looking forward to the, um, Really Big football game (copyright violation if I write the words that sound like Scooper Droll) in a week? Do you have your green/yellow or black/gold face paint ready? Or like many are you only going to watch for the commercials? One commercial you won’t see it the “Jesus Hates Obama” ad. How many of you were looking forward to seeing the Obama bobblehead drop into a fishbowl, with the Jesus bobblehead then seen smiling? Yeah, me either. I think I would have opted to make a chip run during that spot.
One show I did avoid this week was the Piers Morgan interview with Joel and Victoria Osteen. Osteen comes out and admits that there is such a thing as sin. Apparently it doesn’t cover Victoria’s Secret undergarments. Don’t ask, just watch.
Some of the most difficult stories in the Bible are those which portray God ordering the annihilation of entire nations or groups of people. This appears prominently, for example, in the Book of Joshua, when the Hebrews defeated the Canaanites on various occasions to take control of the Promised Land.
How do you deal with these texts?
In the following video, Tremper Longman III discusses “The Genocidal God” and gives us his understanding of a theological framework in which we may read these stories. He suggests that one key is to read them in the light of what the entire Bible teaches about the subject of God’s judgment.
What do you think of his explanation?
Is our struggle today more with the overall idea of God’s wrath and judgment than with specific historic instances of it recorded in the Biblical history?
If Longman’s perspective makes sense, is it still a problem for you that God chose to use human instruments to execute his judgment in the Biblical accounts?
Let’s talk.
Tremper Longman III is Robert H. Gundry Professor of Biblical Studies at Westmont College in Santa Barbara, California. He is also a visiting professor Mars Hill Graduate School, Westminster Theological Seminary, and Fuller Theological Seminary. He lectures regularly at Mars Hill, Regent College in Vancouver and the Canadian Theological Seminary in Calgary.
The Wilberforce Fellowship has collected several of Longman’s video clips on their channel on YouTube.
I refuse. I absolutely refuse to go back to a god who is only interested in what I do, not who I am. I have no interest in a god who keeps score, who I have to appease by doing good things and avoiding bad things. A god who is more interested in institutes and forms and structures than he is in relationships.
The One True God is an intimate God. He is not impressed with my lousy attempts to keep rules. That kind of life just gets in the way of the intimate relationship he wants with each of us.
There is no other religion I know of other than Christianity where intimacy with its god is not only offered, it is demanded. What do we think we are saying when we repeat “God is love” if not that he wants to have an intimate relationship with us?
Some were not pleased with me writing earlier this week to say how God led me to buy a certain car a year ago, and how that car helped to save my son’s life in a serious accident. Some have said the only way God speaks to us today is through the Bible. This is the same Bible that shows us a God who invades lives on regular basis in the most intimate of ways. A God who delights in us as a lover delights in his beloved. A God who does not just request intimacy with us: He demands it.
So the LORD spoke to Moses face to face, as a man speaks to his friend (Exodus 33:11).
My friend and the associate pastor of my church, Gyle Smith, is accused of starting every one of his messages in Genesis 3. Well, it’s not a bad place to start. After all, we were made for the Garden.
We don’t know where the actual Garden of Eden was—and don’t start a discussion where you say you know where it was, ’cause you don’t (and, no, it’s not Jersey, even though it’s called the “Garden State”)—and it doesn’t matter. What does matter is the fact that we no longer live there. God created us to live in a place filled with Good. Everything he made was good. He turned us loose and said, “There! It is good. Eat. Play. Sing. Sleep. Make love. Explore this good world I made for you. The one thing I don’t want you to do is worry about right or wrong. I’ll deal with that. You just live.”
But that wasn’t good enough for us. We had to know if something really—I mean, really—was right. Maybe what I was experiencing, while good, was wrong. And maybe what I was not doing actually was right. How could we know? The serpent had an idea: Why not eat from this tree here? You will then have knowledge of what is right and what is wrong. So we ate. And thus our eyes were opened, and we knew right from wrong. And the first thing we saw was our own nakedness. We were completely open and vulnerable, and it made us ashamed. We reached for the fig leaves to clothe ourselves and cover our shame and nudity.
We now knew right from wrong, but the price we paid for that knowledge was our own death. We were escorted out of the Garden, partly for our own sake. After all, if we had then eaten from the tree of Life, we would have lived forever in a state of perpetual death. It was God’s mercy as well as his wrath that drove us from the Garden.
And since that day, we have longed to return where we belong.

By Chaplain Mike
A website I’ve learned to like when preaching the lectionary is WorkingPreacher.org. One of their entries this week is from David Lose, Marbury E. Anderson Biblical Preaching Chair at Luther Seminary in St. Paul, MN. He discusses this week’s Gospel, the text of the Beatitudes (Matt. 5:1-12), a passage I’ve discussed here on a couple of occasions here on Internet Monk.
David Lose sees them in the same way I do.
At the beginning of his “Sermon on the Mount,” Jesus announces that God’s blessing has come, and that it is available to anyone and everyone. No matter what the world or religion thinks of you—no matter what you think of yourself—you are not disqualified from receiving the benefits of the Kingdom.
In the Beatitudes, Jesus blesses. Period. The Beatitudes are not ethical demands. Not requirements of virtue. Not conditions for being part of the Kingdom. Not character qualities that he is instructing us to develop in our lives.
Blessing. Pure blessing.
Here’s what David Lose says. It will give you a peek at the kind of message I’ll be preaching Sunday.
There is a trap hidden in the Beatitudes that I know I have fallen into countless times, and perhaps you have, too. The trap is a simple as it is subtle: believing that Jesus is setting up the conditions of blessing, rather than actually blessing his hearers.
…But let’s be clear – or at least pay attention to the fact that Matthew is quite clear – Jesus isn’t setting up conditions or terms but rather is just plain blessing people. All kinds of people. All kinds of down-and-out, extremely vulnerable, and at the bottom of the ladder people. Why? To proclaim that God regularly shows up in mercy and blessing just where you least expect God to be – with the poor rather than the rich, those who are mourning rather than celebrating, the meek and the peacemakers rather than the strong and victorious. This is not where citizens of the ancient world look for God and, quite frankly, it’s not where citizens of our own world do either. If God shows up here, Jesus is saying, blessing the weak and the vulnerable, then God will be everywhere, showering all creation and its inhabitants with blessing.
Not even you are disqualified. As hard as it may be to believe, not even I am disqualified. All are welcome. Come to the table, Jesus is waiting.

By Chaplain Mike
I had to take a couple of sick days this week. That’s unusual for me. Our entire family has been blessed with good health, and even the sicknesses we’ve had have not been serious.
It becomes easy to take that for granted.
Two years ago I had an experience that opened my eyes a bit to physical suffering. Though the problem turned out not to be serious and the outcome was good, nothing about what I went through for a couple of days was pleasant. I’d rather not have to go through it again.
So, on this past Sunday night, when I realized I had a fever and a few of the same symptoms, I made a decision right then and there to go to the doctor Monday morning. I’m glad I did. I’ve had a few unpleasant moments, but nothing like the agony of the previous experience.
I described that first illness on the blog where I wrote before coming to Internet Monk. I will re-run it here today to remind us of those in sick beds all around us, so easily forgotten.
I promised a follow-up of my article on “Chapter Two of the Christian Life.†In it I talked about the necessity, once grace has begun to work in us, of working ourselves. I listed nine disciplines or areas of growth that I wanted to talk about. My purpose is not to load people up with guilt or to get people to try to achieve grace through effort. My purpose is to encourage all of you who, like me, have asked, “Now what?â€Â Now we begin the training in Christian living.
To lay the foundation for all the disciplines I plan to talk about, I need to start with the two most basic: humility and obedience. I call them disciplines, and they are: when learned and practiced, however imperfectly, they will train us in right living. But they are not only the means to right living, they are the goal of right living. In other words, we need to practice humility and obedience in order to, well, practice humility and obedience.
So they are virtues to be acquired, not just disciplines to develop virtues. And how are virtues acquired? Aristotle said (and C.S. Lewis and I agree with him) that virtues are acquired through acting as if you possessed internally the virtue that you are trying to exhibit externally. We learn virtues the same way we learn swimming or playing guitar. We do the activity we want to learn. We are terrible at it to begin with, but we know that through directed and continued effort we will eventually get better at swimming or guitar. In fact, we will eventually become a swimmer or a guitar player. The skill will become so internalized that it is no longer an effort we make but a quality of our very nature.
This practice in virtue can feel like hypocrisy, as we pretend to a quality that we don’t possess. We act kind, even when we want to rage; we pretend courage, even when our knees are shaking. Galatians 3:27 talks about putting on Christ, or clothing ourselves with Christ, and this is the same thing: we put on something we are not, but we will grow into the thing we put on. It’s just like getting in the water and splashing around as if we were swimmers, when we’re really not yet. This is the only way we will become virtuous people. No amount of intellectual assent or pleasant fantasy will train us to respond with love when suddenly confronted with hate or to act with courage when facing something terrifying. Only habit built up by training will enable us to acquire virtues and ultimately to become virtuous.
Let me say loud and clear that the purpose of growth in virtue is not to buff up our character so we can look good and avoid embarrassment. The purpose of growth in virtue is to become like Christ. He is our model of virtue, and he gives us the desire and strength to persevere. I’m not offering another feel-good, look-good program. I’m just trying to answer the “How?†we all ask when confronted with Christ’s commands to love God and love our neighbors as ourselves. And I will answer it, insofar as I can, by drawing mostly on the wisdom of others much farther along the road to perfection than I am.Continue reading “Chapter Two Continued: Humility and Obedience”