My Debt to Reformed Theology

By Chaplain Mike

For the past twenty years, I have lived in America’s heartland, in the region where the Second Great Awakening occurred. It’s almost all revivalism all the time around here. Churches that predominate are Methodist, Baptist, Wesleyan, Nazarene, Church of God, Campbellite Christian, and so on. If churches in our area are not connected with those denominations, they tend to follow more modern forms of revivalism, such as the seeker-oriented model. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve had discussions with people about how weak the Bible teaching and how shallow the theological depth is in these parts.

I consider myself blessed to have had extremely good teachers in my Christian walk. My youth pastor led in-depth Bible studies. Our minister practiced expository preaching. I attended Bible college because the Word was so prominent there. As a fairly new convert, I was like a sponge.

The school I attended was strongly dispensationalist in orientation. The only mentions of Reformed (or covenant) theology were negative in tone. Our school intentionally separated itself from “Calvinism” because we claimed to take the Bible literally, whereas Reformed theology spiritualized its plain teaching. After all, they believed in things like amillennialism and infant baptism, as well as the TULIP outline of salvation, which we thought went too far. Our church history education as well as our grasp on the history of interpretation was sorely lacking. You might say we were “Bible only” fundamentalists.Continue reading “My Debt to Reformed Theology”

The New Calvinism

The third week of our conversations about “Three Streams of Post-Evangelicalism” will focus on a movement that has received attention from the secular media as well as from within the church. It has been deemed the “New Calvinism”.

We are responding to Scot McKnight’s recent article in which he identified three alternative paths replacing the old “neo-evangelical coalition”: the Emerging movement, the Ancient-Future movement, and the new Calvinism. We invite you to join us this week as we discuss this third alternative, keeping in mind that we are aiming for a robust and healthy discussion.

We are doing this precisely because we are NOT experts with regard to these movements. We want to learn more. We want to hear your experiences. As pilgrims trying to negotiate the post-evangelical landscape, we are interested to hear of your involvement and interaction with these groups that have grown so much in recent years. Please join the conversation.

On March 12, 2009, Time magazine presented a list of “10 Ideas Changing the World Right Now”. Number 3 on the list? David van Biema said it is “The New Calvinism”.

Neo-Calvinist ministers and authors don’t operate quite on a Rick Warren scale. But, notes Ted Olsen, a managing editor at Christianity Today, “everyone knows where the energy and the passion are in the Evangelical world” — with the pioneering new-Calvinist John Piper of Minneapolis, Seattle’s pugnacious Mark Driscoll and Albert Mohler, head of the Southern Seminary of the huge Southern Baptist Convention. The Calvinist-flavored ESV Study Bible sold out its first printing, and Reformed blogs like Between Two Worlds are among cyber-Christendom’s hottest links. (emphasis mine)

Continue reading “The New Calvinism”

Table Talk: Grace, Humility, and Hospitality

By Chaplain Mike

Today’s Gospel: Luke 14:1, 7-14.

In this Sunday’s text, we find Jesus at a familiar place in the Gospel of Luke—at a table, talking to people who struggle to grasp grace and its implications.

Humility (14:7-11)
In Jesus’ day, the seating arrangement at feasts was in a “U” shape, with the host at the center where the sides joined; the “head” of the table, as it were. The best, most sought-after seats were the ones next to him, and those who had been invited would do their best to procure them. Those to whom good seats had been promised beforehand would often arrive a bit late so that they would be seen “ascending” to the more desirable places. Sometimes, however, the host would invite a guest who sat farther down the line to come and take a seat closer to him. This was a great honor. Of course, this meant someone else got “bumped” down to a less coveted place farther from the head. That would be just plain embarrassing.Continue reading “Table Talk: Grace, Humility, and Hospitality”

iMonk Classic: The Post-Evangelical Bookshelf—A Beginner’s Reading List For Finding Your Way In The Evangelical Wilderness

Classic iMonk Post
by Michael Spencer
Originally posted July 30, 2008

I’ve been doing an interview on “Post-Evangelicalism,” and I thought it would be a good time to list some of the books that define post-evangelicalism for me.

First of all, a brief definition:

Post-evangelicalism is a way of relating to the present seriously compromised, perhaps terminal, condition of evangelicalism by accessing the resources of the broader, deeper, more ancient Christian traditions that contemporary evangelicalism, in its pragmatic idolatry, has largely abandoned as sources and influences.

Please note that post-evangelicalism isn’t a rejection of evangelicalism, but a rejection of the current way of doing evangelicalism and being evangelical.Continue reading “iMonk Classic: The Post-Evangelical Bookshelf—A Beginner’s Reading List For Finding Your Way In The Evangelical Wilderness”

Saturday Ramblings 8.28.10

I’m back—did you miss me? Thanks to my designated pinch-rambler Adam Palmer for filling in for me last week. Taco Town? Who needs Taco Town when you have Deep Blue Fish ‘N Chips? England was wonderful, and I made a lot of new friends. But they talk funny over there. I was asked if I wanted a biscuit. I was picturing this buttermilk biscuit, hot from the oven, covered in butter and honey. Instead I was handed a cookie. So today, I won’t be messing with you. I’ll just say it straight. I’m here to give you 100% pure, gluten-free Saturday Ramblings…

The August edition of Christianity Today has an excerpt from Michael Spencer’s Mere Churchianity: Finding Your Way Back to Jesus-Shaped Spirituality. What do you mean you haven’t read Mere Churchianity? What are you waiting for?!?

Continue reading “Saturday Ramblings 8.28.10”

N.T. Wright on the Hunger for Worship

By Chaplain Mike

Of all matters that draw people to the Ancient-Future path, worship is at the top of the list. As N.T. Wright explains in the following video clip, people all around the world are starving to meet with God in worship.

Wright draws from his own experiences of spiritual formation, his experience as a minister in cathedrals that practice daily, and even hourly worship, and his observation that life in a secularized world has created a deep hunger for worship.

And once a week is not enough.

He encourages us to be imaginative and to recognize the value of liturgy as well as spontaneity in our personal, family, and corporate worship.

Don’t Misunderstand the Ancient-Future Path

By Chaplain Mike

It’s probably clear to many of you by now that I have a great deal of sympathy for the Ancient-Future path as a hopeful way of revitalizing evangelicalism in this post-evangelical era.

But I’m afraid people may have the wrong conception of what I’m talking about when I refer to the Ancient-Future path. I understand some of the confusion, because those who talk about it (including me) make regular reference to such things as historic churches, liturgical worship, and other traditional practices.

It’s important, however, to realize that there is no single uniform way of walking the Ancient-Future path. Continue reading “Don’t Misunderstand the Ancient-Future Path”

The Small god of Modern Evangelicalism

Today’s post is by guest blogger Daniel Jepsen.

Yes, the non-capitilzation of the third word in the title is deliberate. I don’t think the god I am talked about deserves to be capitalized. For I am not talking about the God of the scriptures, but the god that is worshipped in much of modern American evangelicalism.

This god is good, but small and not very powerful. This god is not able to use the foolish, weak and lowly things of this world to shame and nullify the wise, strong, and powerful ((see I Corinthians 1:26-31). That is why those who lead this god’s churches must attempt to change the foolish things into things wise in the ways of this world, and must change the lowly and despised things into things this world likes and respects.

Continue reading “The Small god of Modern Evangelicalism”

David vs. The Rich Young Ruler

Oswald Chambers asks, “Are you more devoted to your idea of what Jesus wants than to Himself?”

“Yes, Lord, I am.”

I will admit that my answer came so readily because God’s been hammering away at me for months to get me to see the distinction in a personal way. How often I pick the path of performing for him over loving him.

I’m embarrassed to tell you that I take refuge almost every day in my idea of what Jesus wants. I’ll venture to say that most of us have our own ideas of that and we feel satisfied or even prideful when we manage to put checkmarks in our spiritual ‘to do’ list or paste in gold stars when we successfully avoid what’s prohibited.

Continue reading “David vs. The Rich Young Ruler”

iMonk Classic: Review of “Evangelicals and Tradition”

Classic iMonk Post
by Michael Spencer
Originally posted June 26, 2007

My list of must-read books for post-evangelicals is short. Newly added at the top of the list: Evangelicals and Tradition: The Formative Influence of the Early Church (Evangelical Ressourcement: Ancient Sources for the Church’s Future) by Baylor University professor of patristics and Baptist minister D. H. Williams (Ph.d, University of Toronto.).

Reviews of D.H. Williams’ work on the need for evangelicals and free churchers to recover the catholic tradition are everywhere on the web. (By both Roman Catholics and by leading Evangelicals.) Williams’ previous book, Retrieving the Tradition and Renewing Evangelicalism: A Primer for Suspicious Protestants, is universally acclaimed and I would predict similar accolades for his more recent work on the formative influence of the early church.

I have simply devoured Williams’ book. Seldom have I underlined and noted so much in one book. As a post-evangelical in spirit, I still have much to learn about the early church and the role of tradition. My own seminary training included absolutely zero specific courses on the first five centuries of Christian history, and no discussion at all of the place of tradition in regard to my own denominational heritage. So Williams has been both a revelation and a feast.Continue reading “iMonk Classic: Review of “Evangelicals and Tradition””