In the King’s Garden (Gen 2), part one

By Chaplain Mike

And now for more “Creation Week” here at Internet Monk.

Oh joy.

This has been prompted by recent disputes in the blogosphere between some prominent Christian leaders, who hold to a Young Earth Creationism position, and the BioLogos Forum, a group of Christians from various disciplines that asserts the basic evolutionary model best describes God’s work of creation.

We love conversation ’round these parts, and nothing seems to stir up discussion like this subject.

So, this week we are laying down our arms, climbing out of the trenches, comparing notes, expressing our convictions with some grace and humility, and talking.

I hope.

Because we agree that what the Bible says is foundational to these issues, we are emphasizing several posts that deal directly with the text. We have already looked at Genesis 1. Today, we look at chapter 2.

Continue reading “In the King’s Garden (Gen 2), part one”

John Walton: Approaching Genesis as an Ancient Text

In this video, John Walton, Professor of OT at Wheaton College (IL), discusses how we must approach Genesis as an ancient text. Readers must try their best to understand something of the thought-world of people in the Ancient Near East and to read, as much as possible, from their point of view.

One good example of that is grasping the language that portrays “Temple” imagery in Genesis 1-2.

The Land of Blessing

By Chaplain Mike

One of the interesting points of understanding that I came to accept when I studied under John Sailhamer is that there are two focus points in Genesis 1.

  • First, God created everything (1.1).
  • Second, within his creation God prepared a special land in the world where he put Adam and Eve (1.2-31).

English versions obscure this by translating the Hebrew word eretz as “earth” rather than “land,” which is its more common meaning. For modern readers, the word “earth” conjures up pictures of the globe that we know as Earth, the planet in its entirety as it exists in outer space among the other heavenly bodies. However, this is not nor could it be the viewpoint of the author of Genesis. I have already noted that verse 1 should be translated, “In the beginning, God created the skies and the land.” In Genesis 1.1, the author’s perspective is that of one standing on the ground, looking out across a landscape and thinking about God’s creation of all things from that point of view.

Within this comprehensive creation, God prepared a place (a land) where he pronounced his blessing. Beginning at Genesis 1.2, the focus narrows considerably to “the land,” and in particular, to the land where he brought forth living creatures and human representatives (1.24-31). What land is this?Continue reading “The Land of Blessing”

Another Look: My View of Genesis 1

Another Look at a Post…
By Chaplain Mike
From March 27, 2010

My interest in the first chapters of Genesis began to blossom when I was in seminary, studying under Dr. John Sailhamer. Over the years, I have come back to it again and again. My understanding has grown and been refined each time I’ve taken it up.

It saddens me that Genesis 1 has been so often co-opted for use in contemporary battles with science, particularly with regard to the age of the earth and the scientific model of evolution.

This has made it extremely difficult to simply teach Genesis. For while Christians need to stay informed and be able to interact with the findings of science (see, “Bruce Waltke on Staying in the Discussion“), such concerns were certainly not those of the Torah’s original audience, nor are they essential to studying what the Bible teaches.

Jesus said that the Bible’s central message is all about: (1) God’s Messiah and his redemptive work, and (2) God’s Mission of taking the Good News of forgiveness to all the world (Luke 24:45-47). The groundwork for that message is laid right here in Genesis 1.

Today, I would like to share with you the way I view this foundational passage from the Bible.Continue reading “Another Look: My View of Genesis 1”

Sunday’s Gospel: On a Journey with Jesus

By Chaplain Mike

Fifth Sunday after Pentecost
Lectionary Readings
• 1 Kings 19:15-16, 19-21
• Psalm 16
• Galatians 5:1, 13-25
• Luke 9:51-62

Today’s Gospel: Luke 9:51-62 (NRSV)

When the days drew near for him to be taken up, he set his face to go to Jerusalem. And he sent messengers ahead of him. On their way they entered a village of the Samaritans to make ready for him; but they did not receive him, because his face was set towards Jerusalem. When his disciples James and John saw it, they said, ‘Lord, do you want us to command fire to come down from heaven and consume them?’ But he turned and rebuked them. Then they went on to another village.

As they were going along the road, someone said to him, ‘I will follow you wherever you go.’ And Jesus said to him, ‘Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head.’ To another he said, ‘Follow me.’ But he said, ‘Lord, first let me go and bury my father.’ But Jesus said to him, ‘Let the dead bury their own dead; but as for you, go and proclaim the kingdom of God.’ Another said, ‘I will follow you, Lord; but let me first say farewell to those at my home.’ Jesus said to him, ‘No one who puts a hand to the plough and looks back is fit for the kingdom of God.’

Continue reading “Sunday’s Gospel: On a Journey with Jesus”

iMonk Classic: Answers Not in Genesis

Classic iMonk Post
by Michael Spencer
From March 1, 2006

Nothing discourages me about the future of evangelicals like “young earth creationism,” Hamm style.

Josh puts it well in this post at Here We Stand: “Every time I read someone saying it’s the Christian’s duty to refute biology and physics with the Bible, something inside me just dies a little.”

I’m feelin’ that as well. The army of preachers who have proclaimed themselves the new Lords of Science make me ever more convinced that evangelicalism is souring fast.

Continue reading “iMonk Classic: Answers Not in Genesis”

Back to the Trenches!

By Chaplain Mike

The troops have been mustered.

And folks, it ain’t gonna be pretty.

So, this week, in the “where angels fear to tread” category, we’re going to gear up and go back to the front lines of the Creation Wars.

As you know, I have recommended the site BioLogos and have posted materials from their blog. I truly appreciate the mission of BioLogos and the spirit with which they pursue that mission.

The BioLogos Foundation is a group of Christians, many of whom are professional scientists, biblical scholars, philosophers, theologians, pastors, and educators, who are concerned about the long history of disharmony between the findings of science and large sectors of the Christian faith. We believe that the Bible is the inspired Word of God. We also believe that evolution, properly understood, best describes God’s work of creation. Founded by Dr. Francis Collins, BioLogos addresses the escalating culture war between science and faith, promoting dialog and exploring the harmony between the two. We are committed to helping the church – and students, in particular – develop worldviews that embrace both of these complex belief structures, and that allow science and faith to co-exist peacefully.

Now, whether or not you accept their statement, “We also believe that evolution, properly understood, best describes God’s work of creation,” it is my strong contention that all Christians ought to welcome the presence and contribution of a group like BioLogos.

Continue reading “Back to the Trenches!”

Saturday Ramblings 6.26.10

Yawn. Kind of a slow week here at the iRanch. Methinks many of you took the week to vacate. And it looks like you picked up  a few souvenirs along the way. Salt and pepper shakers. Tacky t-shirts. Toothpick holders. Saltwater taffy. So as a way to welcome you back to civilization, we present your souvenir Saturday Ramblings.

Apparently, if you are a healthy church in the United States today, you are either a multi-site church or you are planning to go in that direction. If you are one of those old-fashioned “one site” churches, you must not be healthy. So, is your church healthy or dying? Or do you agree with this diagnosis in the first place?

In contrast to the multi-site church is the multi-ethnicity church. Mark DeYmaz is the pastor of Mosaic Church of Central Arkansas and shares his thoughts about serving a variety of ethnic backgrounds in one church in this interview at Out Of Ur.

In the meantime, pastors in Buenos Aires believe their city should have only one church. What is the difference, do you think, between the churches of North and South America?

Continue reading “Saturday Ramblings 6.26.10”

R. Crumb’s Book Of Genesis Reviewed

Genesis is a source of children’s stories, a favorite among Sunday school curriculum writers. And what is there not to like? There are animals and boats and rainbows. There is a man with a fancy robe made with lots of bright colors. There is a garden where everyone is happy and safe. And there is a kind, gentle God watching over us all.

And then there is the real Genesis.

R. Crumb (Robert Dennis Crumb is his full name) is a comic book illustrator of some fame. “Some fame” as in one of the most famous, or infamous, depending on how you look at it. He came up with the character for the first rated X animated movie, if that tells you anything. So just what is he doing illustrating a book of the Bible, The Book of Genesis Illustrated by R. Crumb? And why are we giving it the coveted “recommended” review?

Continue reading “R. Crumb’s Book Of Genesis Reviewed”

Balance

Virtue and truth, if out of balance, cease to be virtue or truth.

That’s a bit short for a post, so I’ll expand.

Any virtue developed in isolation from other virtues becomes a vice. Truthfulness, untempered by kindness, becomes a critical spirit. Gentleness without courage is weak. Empathy without self-discipline is soppy. It is easy for us to develop the qualities we are more naturally good at, and we want to congratulate ourselves that we are growing spiritually. But if we don’t work on the opposite virtue, we may just be making ourselves intolerable. A pitcher who develops his right arm and neglects every other muscle in his body would be a freak, not an athlete.

Continue reading “Balance”