iMonk Classic: God of the Hubble Universe

Star-Forming Region LH 95 in the Large Magellanic Cloud

Classic iMonk Post
by Michael Spencer
from June 2005

One of my life-long loves is astronomy. I’ve owned some very nice telescopes, and I’ve spent many a clear, cold winter night out on someone’s farm, looking at the glories of the heavens. Since I was a child of the golden age of the space program, my interest in astronomy and NASA made me a big fan of the Hubble Space Telescope. My students are quite used to me refering to my favorite Hubble photographs, and getting a bit glassy-eyed about the vast universe that Hubble brings into view through its photos. The beauty of the Hubble photos continues to be a delight for me, and I can never get enough of those that show dozens of galaxies filling a photo the size of a postcard. It’s quite astonishing.

When I look at Hubble’s pictures, I get some idea — a very paltry one — of the vastness and greatness of the universe. The miniscule fact of all earthly concerns fills my mind. I realize that I am far less than dust. There is really no calculation as to how small I am, and how insignificant I am, in such a vast and majestic universe as we glimpse through Hubble’s mirror. What we can see is awe-inspiring, but it is less than a sliver — less than a grain of dust- of what we cannot see.

Hubble has always been a deeply theological hobby for me, because the men who wrote lines about “the heavens declare the glory of God,” had no idea what they were actually saying. Hubble deepens and further exalts the greatness of God. It magnifies the miracle of the incarnation. It inspires worship at the being that would call such a universe into existence and sustain it by the word of His power.

Continue reading “iMonk Classic: God of the Hubble Universe”

Our Misogynist, Genocidal God, And Other Supposed Problems With The Bible

There are some Old Testament representations that can understandably give us Christians headaches, especially when we want to represent the Bible as inspired of God, authoritative, and trustworthy. We affirm (for good reason) that God is good and loving, and yet it is hard to reason through what seems to be endorsements of cultural sins such as sexism, racism, genocide, and slavery.

This specter has been raised time and time again, whenever I’m engaged in discussions with skeptics. And honestly, I think a lot of gut-reaction responses by well-meaning Christian apologists only cause more distraction from the truth, ironically—all in an effort to defend the integrity of Scriptures . . . as we modernists would define such.

So I want to suggest what I think is a very important, fundamental theological theme that is evident throughout the entirety of the Bible, and which should be weighed in any of these kind of discussions: God condescends (condescends in a good way); that is, God is always about meeting people where they are as he draws them to himself.

Continue reading “Our Misogynist, Genocidal God, And Other Supposed Problems With The Bible”

Leithart on “The Persistent Marginalization of the Eucharist”

The Last Supper, Duccio di Buoninsegna

Lent 2012: A Journey through the Wilderness
Leithart on “The Persistent Marginalization of the Eucharist”

“When the Sign seals the Word, the church becomes a communion of martyrs ready to bear the cross because they have consumed the cross.”

• Peter Leithart, “Do This” (First Things)

• • •

Readers and emailers have brought Peter Leithart’s March 23 article in First Things to my attention in recent days, and it is worth our discussion.

Leithart is pastor of Trinity Reformed Church in Moscow, Idaho, and Senior Fellow of Theology and Literature at New St. Andrews College. His thoughts are especially appropriate for post-evangelicals to consider during Lent, for he puts his finger on a weakness in evangelicalism that most of us have sensed deeply. The wilderness we have experienced is a place of hunger and thirst, and like deer panting for streams of water we have longed for nourishment and refreshment evangelical church culture simply could not provide.

Leithart explains one of the main reasons why.

“I was recently asked to identify the biggest cultural challenge facing American Evangelicals. In my judgment, the biggest cultural challenge is not “out there” in “the culture” but internal — I almost said, “inherent” — to Evangelicalism: the persistent marginalization of the Eucharist in Evangelical church life, piety, and political engagement. Evangelicals will be incapable of responding to the specific challenges of our time with any steadiness or effect until the Eucharist becomes the criterion of all Christian cultural thinking and the source from which all genuinely Christian cultural engagement springs.” (emphasis mine)

Why does Peter Leithart assert that the Eucharist is so important, so central, so significant for Christians and our relationship with our culture?

Continue reading “Leithart on “The Persistent Marginalization of the Eucharist””

Lenten Prayer Services: A Temple in the Wilderness

Lent 2012: A Journey through the Wilderness
Lenten Prayer Services: A Temple in the Wilderness

During Lent, I’ve had the privilege of leading prayer services at our church on Wed. evenings. Our pastor asked my wife and I to do this, using mostly contemporary music accompanied by piano and guitar. Each week I put a service booklet together and we follow it. The service lasts about 30 minutes.

I thought you might like to see what we’ve been doing. Perhaps you can get some ideas for simple services in your own context for this and other seasons as well.

We’ve been using Genesis 1 as our text. Why? Because the first chapter of the Bible describes how God turned the wilderness into his temple.

In my view, Genesis 1 has two primary subjects:

  1. God created everything that exists (Gen. 1:1)
  2. God prepared a good land to be his temple in the world (1:2-2:3)

The land began as a wilderness — an uninhabitable place, covered with water and thick darkness. In the first three days, God formed the land by providing the elements basic to life. The the second three days, God filled the land with living creatures. On the sixth day, in addition to the living creatures who inhabit the land, he created humans in his image to be his priests and to represent him (this is what “in his image” suggests). He blessed them so that they would fill the earth with his blessing. On the seventh day God rested, which in ancient near eastern parlance suggests that he took his throne and commenced his rule from his temple. In this way Genesis describes how God transformed the wilderness into his temple that his glory and blessing may fill the earth.

I think this theme of God transforming the wilderness is appropriate for the Lenten season. For the story of our salvation is the same. In Christ, God has inaugurated his new creation. He has taken the wilderness of our lives, formless and empty because of sin, and is transforming them into his temples of light and life. He has called us, his sons and daughters, to be his priests. He has blessed us and given us his Spirit that we might be fruitful and multiply his blessing throughout the entire world. Christ, who died to make this possible, has been raised and exalted on high, where he has sat down at the right hand of the Father. He has taken his place of rest and he reigns over all. We have been raised up and seated with him in heavenly places by grace through faith. Our wilderness is transformed in Christ, and the Lord reigns!

After the jump, I will give a basic outline of how we pray through this emphasis in our services each week during Lent.

Continue reading “Lenten Prayer Services: A Temple in the Wilderness”

I Know It’s Not for Everyone, but I’ve Found an Oasis in the Mainline

Lent 2012: A Journey through the Wilderness
I Know It’s Not for Everyone, but I’ve Found an Oasis in a Mainline Church

In other essays here on Internet Monk, I have described my own journey through the post-evangelical wilderness. I grew up in a mainline church (United Methodist), but most of my spiritual journey has been in evangelicalism.

I had a spiritual awakening in Southern Baptist churches when I was in my late teens, attended a non-denominational and dispensational Bible college, served as pastor in a Baptist church (nominally American Baptist that became independent), a Bible church (Independent Fundamental), went to seminary at one of the most prominent conservative evangelical seminaries in the world and received my ministry license in the Evangelical Free Church, and served in two non-denominational “Community” churches that were founded by Wesleyans, most of whom had ties to Asbury Seminary.

When I resigned from a difficult church situation, I entered the wilderness. After several false starts and experiments, my wife and I found a lovely ELCA Lutheran church with a simple liturgy, wonderful music, a healthy and grounded pastor, a hospitable congregation, and an emphasis on Christ, grace, vocation, and other Lutheran essentials that answered questions I had been turning over in my mind for years in my evangelical settings. Last fall I wrote a “wilderness update” about coming to terms with the faith tradition to which I now belong and the decision I’d made to pursue ordination in the ELCA.

Though I recognize my debt to evangelicalism and am grateful for what God has taught me on the journey, coming back to a mainline church for me means coming home. I’ve found my oasis. I don’t hesitate to call myself a mainline Christian.

Continue reading “I Know It’s Not for Everyone, but I’ve Found an Oasis in the Mainline”

Sights along the Road…(3/25/12)

Baumhaus (Treehouse) Hotel, Germany

If we’re going to hit the road, we have to find a place to stay, right?

Well, I don’t know about you, but I’m tired of the same ol’ same ol’ when it comes to motels and hotels. So today as we review some of the good stuff I’ve been reading and thinking about on the Sunday drive we call “Sights along the Road,” I’m including pix of a few of the most unusual hotels in the world. This is just a small sampling, so I’m sure we’ll return to this again, but today we’ll show you a few intriguing places where a traveler can lay his or her head down for the night.

A person can stay in a treehouse, in the fuselage of a 727, in an ice palace that is re-constructed every winter, in a building that has such crazy angles and shapes it can only be called “Crazy,” inside a giant Beagle or Chinese god statue, or perhaps an inn made completely out of garbage collected from the beach will suit you.

Well, think about it. You’ve got a little while. Before it’s time to bed down for the night, we have some driving to do…

Continue reading “Sights along the Road…(3/25/12)”

iMonk Classic: The Unresolved Tensions of Evangelicalism (5)

Lent 2012: A Journey through the Wilderness
The Unresolved Tensions of Evangelicalism, conclusion
A classic Michael Spencer iMonk post from Nov. 2008

NOTE: On Sundays in Lent, we will run these classic essays from Michael Spencer on the evangelical wilderness.

I now come to the last post in this series on The Unresolved Tensions of Evangelicalism.

In this post I will write a response to each of the four topics of personal disillusionment: The Biblical worldview, Christian experience, Christian community and Christian commitment itself.

In my response, I hope to say something constructive to those evangelicals who have left or are contemplating leaving evangelicalism, as well to loyal evangelicals within the church.

Continue reading “iMonk Classic: The Unresolved Tensions of Evangelicalism (5)”

IM Book Review: How God Became King

How God Became King: The Forgotten Story of the Gospels
by N.T. Wright, HarperOne/2012

• • •

N.T. Wright continues his work of laying a foundation for what I believe will become the standard evangelical theology of the next generation.

Yes, I think his work is that important.

A key part of that work is lifting the Gospels to their rightful place of prominence in the Christian faith and message.

As the Torah (the five books of Moses, Genesis-Deuteronomy) is preeminent in the Hebrew Bible, so are the Gospels to the New Testament. The Torah is Israel’s foundational Story and, growing organically out of Israel’s Story the Gospels give us the Church’s foundational Story. If the Pentateuch is the Torah of Moses then the Gospels (plus Acts) form the Torah of Jesus which fulfills Moses. “The law indeed was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ” (John 1:17).

In fact, together, the books we call “gospels” are THE Gospel. As Scot McKnight reminds us in his fine, complementary book, The King Jesus Gospel, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John are four witnesses to the one Gospel, which is the Story of Jesus. We constantly obscure this by our language. It is “The Gospel according to Matthew,” “The Gospel according to Mark,” and so on, not “The Four Gospels.”

Since my earliest days in evangelicalism, I have been taught differently. The emphasis was not on the Gospels, but on propositional theology (doctrine) rooted in the epistles (mostly Paul’s letters). This theology was systematized and adhered to through “doctrinal statements” in the church and Christian institutions and shared with others as “the plan of salvation.” The result is the “soterian” gospel that McKnight writes about: a “gospel shaped entirely with the ‘in and out’ issue of salvation”; it becomes “so singularly focused on the personal-Plan-of-Salvation and how-we-get-saved that we eliminate the Story of Israel and the Story of Jesus altogether.”

A better grasp on the Gospel requires greater emphasis on and understanding of the Gospels.

Continue reading “IM Book Review: How God Became King”

Saturday Ramblings 3.24.12

Welcome to the March Madness edition of Saturday Ramblings. I asked the Synonymous Rambler to take charge of the leftovers this week so I could focus on all of the Ohio teams still (as of this writing) in the tournament. But SR is also caught up in the madness of this third month of the year. So I will shoulder on best I can as I watch hoops on the TV. (Mother Superior Denise Spencer has given me permission to leave the abbey Friday night to attend a Man Party where basketball will be watched and man-food will be consumed. And everyone said, Amen!) So when you are reading this on Saturday morning, we will have one, two or three Ohio teams in the Elite Eight. My father graduated from UC. My mom from Ohio. I took graduate courses at The Ohio State University. And I’ve always loved Xavier! I can’t lose! And neither can you, for it is time to ramble.

First of all, thanks to each and every one who continue to donate to InternetMonk. We spend about $175 a month just to keep this site up and going. Your publisher does not have money in his pockets to fund this. Your donations are very welcome. You can use the PayPal button on the right side of this page. Thank you once again.

Martha O’Ireland shared a brilliant piece with us on Thursday in which she discusses atheists wanting to separate mind and matter, aiming to produce a perfect mind. In the comments that followed, Headless Unicorn Guy reminded us that this line of thinking, called Singularity, was featured on the cover of Time last year. All this to say, C.S. Lewis scooped all of us with the making of the supermind in his wonderful book, That Hideous Strength. Haven’t read it? You should, right now.

Continue reading “Saturday Ramblings 3.24.12”

Pete Enns on Mistakes in the Adam/Evolution Discussion

Creation of Man I, Chagall

Note from CM: We have asked Dr. Peter Enns before for permission to rerun his writing, and I’m tempted to do it a lot. Enns has received enormous attention from a wide audience for what he has to say about Biblical interpretation and the faith/science debate. That’s because he is courageous and clear-thinking, and frankly, what he says makes a lot of sense. But whether you agree or disagree with him, one undeniable contribution he has made has been to continue the conversation in a way that is thoughtful and civil.

This particular piece is a good follow-up to last Saturday’s “More Tired Rhetoric” post because it counters some of that pure rhetoric that keeps people from talking to rather than past each other.

The following post ran on Enns’ blog on November 10, 2011.

• • •

Recurring Mistakes in the Adam/Evolution Discussion
by Dr. Peter Enns

Over the past two weeks or so, there has been quite a bit of blog discussion over the question of Adam in light of evolution. I have kept up with various websites and other postings—not to mention comments on my own website.

Opinions vary, of course, and the Internet can be a good place to air one’s views and have a rousing back and forth debate. Nothing at all wrong with that. But, as I began reading editorials and comments, I saw patterns of responses that served more to obscure the issues before us than enlighten.

I began jotting down these patterns, thinking that, perhaps, I’ll write a brief post about “problems to avoid if we want to get anywhere in this important discussion.” But my list of recurring mistakes grew to fifteen—well beyond one post.

So, we’ll begin today with the first three recurring mistakes —in no particular order whatsoever. The others will follow in the days to come.

1. It’s all about the authority of the Bible.
I can understand why this claim might have rhetorical effect, but this issue is not about biblical authority. It’s about how the Bible is to be interpreted. It’s about hermeneutics.

It’s always about hermeneutics.

Continue reading “Pete Enns on Mistakes in the Adam/Evolution Discussion”